摘要
目的:从循证医学的角度对C-反应蛋白诊断冠心病价值作文献评价。方法:参照诊断性试验的评价指标对文献的设计方案、研究对象的选择、参考值的确立、诊断试验的评价指标等进行评价。结果:在纳入的65篇文献中49篇说明了研究对象的来源;27篇与金标准进行了比较;只有1篇提及盲法,没有文章说明临界值的确定,没有文章说明诊断性指标(敏感度、特异度、似然比等)。结论:提示目前尚无临床证据表明C-反应蛋白作为冠心病的独立指标。
Objective To evaluate the value of C-reactive in literatures of coronary heart disease based on evidence-based medicine.Methods The literatures were evaluated according to the evidence-based medicine principles.Main outcomes include design methods,sample screening establishment of control group,blind method,and criteria of diagnostic trials.Results In the 65 collected reports,there were 49 reports which had explained where the study objects come from,gold standard was adopted in 27 reports,blind method was ...
出处
《实用医技杂志》
2008年第27期3653-3654,共2页
Journal of Practical Medical Techniques
关键词
C反应蛋白
冠心病
循证医学
金标准
诊断试验
C-reactive protein
Coronary heart disease
Evidence-based medicine
Gold standard
Diagnosis tests