5Yip W. M.,Pang S. Y.,Yim W.S.,et al. ROC curve analysis of lesi on detectability on phantoms:comparison of digital spot mam mography with conventional spot mammography. BJR,2001,74:621~628.
6Fink C.,Hallscheidt P.J.,Noeldge G.,et al. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector:image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography. AJR,2002,178:481~486.
7Strotzer M.,Volk M.,Frund R.,et al. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector:image quality at standard detector dose and 33%dose reduction. AJR,2002,178:169~171.
8Garmer M.,Hennigs S.P.,Jager H.J.,et al. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging:diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study. A JR,2000,174:75 ~80.
9Kim Y.A.,Cho K.S.,Song K.S.,et al. Urinary calculi on computed radiography:comparison of observer performance with hard-copy versus soft-copy images on different viewer systems. AJR,2001,177:331~335.