期刊文献+

寻求自由与秩序的平衡——中美乞讨权比较 被引量:7

Finding the Balance between Liberty and Order——The Rights to Beg in the United States and China's Mainland
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为贫困现象衍生物的乞讨不仅难以有效消除,而且越来越成为各国政府、尤其是城市政府实现有效治理的一大难题。为了实现自由与秩序之间的平衡,中美两国政府都设计并实施了多种规制方案解决乞讨及其所带来的问题。两国的规制模式之间存在着值得关注的相似和差异,既求同存异又殊途同归。本文的结论认为,为了达到更优质的平衡,政府应当努力消除迫使人们乞讨的贫困现象,而不能单纯依赖于乞讨规制措施。 As a result of poverty,begging is not only difficult to eradicate,but has also increasingly become a major issue defying governments at large,especially city governments.To balance liberty and order,the American and Chinese governments both designed and adopted methods to resolve the problems resulted from begging.These methods have both similarities and differences.The paper concludes that,to reach proper balance,governments should try their best to eradicate poverty which forces people to beg,rather than ...
作者 林彦
出处 《上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期21-27,共7页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 上海市浦江人才计划资助
关键词 乞讨权 自由 秩序 平衡 rights to beg liberty order balance
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献99

  • 1陈弘毅.论香港特别行政区法院的违宪审查权[J].中外法学,1998,10(5):12-18. 被引量:30
  • 2Nancy Meersman, NH Laws, Updated in 70s, Tolerate Panhandling, THE UNION LEADER (Manchester, NH), May. 16, 1997, at A 7.
  • 3因格拉斯亚.《禁乞议案胎死腹中》.
  • 4Robert Ingrassia, Proposal to Ban Panhandling Dies in City, The Dallas Morning News, Feb. 3, 1998, at 14A.
  • 5斯科特.《市政府对乞讨禁令说不》.
  • 6Monica Scott, City Says No to A Ban on Panhandling, Orlando Sentinel (Florida), Jan. 23, 2001, at C3.
  • 7LA. REV. STAT. §14:107 (West 1986).
  • 8MISS. CODE ANN.§ 97 -35 -37 (1972).
  • 9ARIZ. REV. STAT. ANN, § 13-2905(A) (3) (1989).
  • 10COLO. REV. STAT.§ 18-9-112(2)(A) (1986).

共引文献40

同被引文献80

引证文献7

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部