期刊文献+

安徽省13市县主动发现麻风病效果评价 被引量:3

Evaluation on the effect of active patients detecting for leprosy in 13 cities in Anhui province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价低流行区疫村调查、密切接触者调查和可疑线索调查主动发现病人效果。方法在13个市县通过宣传发动群众、培训乡村医生、密切接触者调查、专业医生确诊等措施,以达到主动发现病人的目的。结果 13个市县共筛查270万人,发现11例麻风患者。线索凋查确诊发现率较高(7.3‰),疫村调查确诊发现率极低(0.0004‰)。结论低流行区主动发现病人投入大,发现病人少,成本效益低,应将工作重点放到基层医务人员培训和大众健康宣传,以达到早期发现病人。 Objective To evaluate the efficiency of active patients detecting measures including epidemic sources investigation, close contacting interviewing and suspected clues surveying in leprosy-low-epidemic area. Methods The study was undertaken in 13 cities/counties. Several measures were taken to detect patients actively including publicizing leprosy knowledge and arousing people to find patients, training village doctors, interviewing close contacting, professional doctors diagnosing and some other measures. Results 11 cases of leprosy were screened out of 27 million peoples. The detection rate was 7.3 ‰ by the measure of suspected clues investigation, obviously higher than that by means of epidemic sources investigation (0.0004‰). Conclusion Appling active patients detecting measures to find leprosy patients in low-epidem ic area was high costing and low efficiency. In order to achieve the purpose of early detection of leprosy patients, grass-roots unit medical staff training and publicizing leprosy knowledge should be emphasized.
作者 李延庆
出处 《热带病与寄生虫学》 2009年第2期87-88,共2页 Journal of Tropical Diseases and Parasitology
关键词 麻风病 病例发现 评价 Leprosy Case-finding Evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献14

  • 1陈树民,张艳芳,黄金萍,张林,刘兵.麻风低流行状态是否仍需要接触者检查?[J].中国麻风皮肤病杂志,2004,20(6):533-535. 被引量:4
  • 2WHO. Weekly Epidemiological Record 2005, 80:13.
  • 3WHO THELEP. Persisting Mycobacterium Leprae Among THELEP Trial Patients in Bamako and Chingleput. Lep Rev 1987,58:325-337.
  • 4Pierre J, Ji BH. The marchoux chemotherapy study group. Relapse after Long - Term follow up of multibacillary patients treated by WHO multidrug regimen. Int J Lepr 1995,63:195 -201.
  • 5Girdhar BK, Girdhar A, Kumar A. Relapses in multibacillary leprosy patients: Effect of length of therapy. Lepr Rev 2000, 71 : 144 -153.
  • 6WHO TDR. Elimination of Leprosy as a Public Health Problem-Current Status and Challenges Ahead. WHO TDR/SWG/2002, 57- 71.
  • 7Meima A. The Future in Incidence of leprosy: A Scenario Analysis. Bull WHO 2004, 82:373 - 380.
  • 8李桓英,胡鹭芳,罗九思,刘学明,翦大明,邬佩玮.多菌型麻风病人固定疗程的联合化疗[J].中国麻风杂志,1998,14(1):1-6. 被引量:7
  • 9李桓英,袁联潮,胡鹭芳,靳征,黄文标,李雄,刘国才,李进岚,杨忠民.麻风在FD MDT后复发的危险性[J].中国麻风杂志,1998,14(2):69-74. 被引量:7
  • 10沈建平,李文忠,陈祥生,余美文,江澄,朱成斌.中国12403例麻风复发病例分析[J].中华皮肤科杂志,2000,33(S1):10-13. 被引量:19

共引文献28

同被引文献19

  • 1张健安,方丽萍,张杜娟.安徽歙县麻风病低流行状态下防治工作现状[J].热带病与寄生虫学,2013,11(1):25-27. 被引量:3
  • 2孟庆联.基本消灭麻风病后麻风病防治工作存在的问题及对策[J].安徽预防医学杂志,2007,13(2):93-95. 被引量:3
  • 3Robbins G,Tripathy VM,Misra VN,Mohanty RK. Ancient skeletal evidence for leprosy in India (2000 B.C.)[J].PLoS One,2009,(05):e5669.
  • 4马海德.麻风防治手册[M]南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1989.
  • 5陈贤义;李文忠;陈家琨.麻风病防治手册[M]北京:科学出版社,20021-2.
  • 6Ramos -E-Silva M,Silveira Lima T. Advances in tropical diseases[J].Giornale Italiano Di Dermatologia E Venereologia,2011,(05):353-371.
  • 7Lucas AO. Recent advances in tropical diseases research[J].Zeitschrift fur Die Gesamte Innere Medizin und Ihre Grenzgebiete,1983,(10):49-53.
  • 8李文忠.现代麻风病学[M]上海:上海科学技术出版社,2006313-317.
  • 9Byamungu DC,Ogbeiwi OI. Integrating leprosy control into general health service in a war situation:the level after 5 years in eastern Congo[J].Leprosy Review,2003,(01):68-78.
  • 10M.Ruby Siddiqui,Nageswara Rao Velidi,Surendra Pati,Nilambar Rath. Integration of Leprosy Elimination into Primary Health Care in Orissa,India[J].PLoS One,2009,(12):e8351.

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部