摘要
卢梭的自然教育本质上是一种自由的教育。但在《爱弥儿》中,爱弥儿并不"自由",他处于教师的权威控制之中。这就是"卢梭悖论"。本文对卢梭悖论进行了分析,认为,在卢梭那里,权威和自由的悖论为正义至上所消解。
Rousseau's natural education essentially a kind of education of freedom.However,in Emile the boy named Emile is not free.He is under the authoritative control of his teacher.This is‘Rousseau's paradox'.The author analyzes this paradox,and contends that Justice as the supreme in Rousseau avoids the paradox between freedom and authority.
出处
《现代教育论丛》
2008年第10期8-12,共5页
Modern Education Review
关键词
卢梭
正义至上
《爱弥儿》
卢梭悖论
rousseau
justice as the supreme
emile
Rousseau's paradox
