摘要
正常操作取款机,却因取款机故障而获利,在只需支付1元对价即可获1000元人民币的诱惑下,犯罪嫌疑人许霆取款170余次,获利17.5万元。一审以盗窃罪对其提起公诉,判决后却引发空前争论,刑民之争、罪名之争、刑罚之争,各持己见。从法律角度来解析该案,了解相关法律规定,直面现行法律缺漏,评述建议,用个案反思方式推动法制建设进程。
As the failure of the ATM, Xuting get 1000 yuan by 1 yuan's payment. In that temptation, he drew over 170 times, gained 175 thousands yuan. After the first instance, larceny' judgment,aroused a firework. The thesis is based the view of law to analyses this case, propelling the rule of law by single case research.
出处
《六盘水师范高等专科学校学报》
2008年第4期34-37,共4页
Journal of Liupanshui Teachers College
关键词
许霆案
盗窃
无期徒刑
Xuting case
larceny
life imprisonment
