期刊文献+

基于蚁群智能的遥感影像分类新方法 被引量:23

Classification of Remote Sensing Images based on Ant Colony Optimization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 智能式遥感分类是遥感研究的新热点。提出了一种基于蚁群智能规则挖掘(ant-miner)的遥感影像分类新方法。遥感数据各波段之间存在较强的相关性,这种相关性往往会导致分类产生误差。而ant-miner算法中的信息素是基于规则整体性能的,信息素的动态更新能有效地处理相关性较强的数据,所提供的正反馈信息能纠正启发式函数缺陷所造成的错误。因此,蚁群智能算法应用于遥感分类具有一定的优势。将该方法用于广州市地区的遥感影像,取得了较好的分类结果。并与See5.0决策树方法及最大似然方法(MLH)进行了对比研究,实验结果表明,蚁群智能算法分类精度比后两者的分类精度更高。 This paper presents a bottom-up approach to improve the classification performance for remote sensing applications.Top-down approaches,such as statistical classifiers,have inherited limitations in dealing with complicated relationships in classification.For example,data correlation between bands of remote sensing imagery has caused problems in generating satisfactory classification with statistical methods.In this paper,ant colony optimization(ACO) based on swarm intelligence is used to improve classification performance.Actually,ACO is a complex multi-agent system,in which agents with simple intelligence can complete complex tasks through cooperation such as classification problems.Ants guide their route selection based on pheromone,which is accumulated from the collective movements of individual ants.In this way,an ant learns from the past experience of others.Ant-Miner is different from decision tree approaches.The entropy measure is a local heuristic measure,which considers only one attribute at a time,and so it is sensitive to attribute correlation problems.Whereas in Ant-Miner,pheromone updating tends to cope better with attribute correlation,since pheromone updating is directly based on the performance of the rule as a whole.Thus,Ant-Miner should have great potential in improving remote sensing classification.In this study,an Ant-Miner program for discovering classification rules is developed for the classification of remote sensing images.In the Ant-Miner program,the route search by an ant colony is to find the best links between attribute nodes and class nodes.An attribute node corresponds to a band value of remote sensing images.An attribute node can only be selected once and must be associated with a class node.Each route corresponds to a classification rule,and discovering a classification rule can be regarded as searching for an optimal route.To enable ACO to effectively classify remote sensing imagery of very large data sets,original band values are sliced into a number of intervals by using a discretization technique.The ACO method is more explicit and comprehensible than mathematical equations.Our study in Guangzhou city indicates that the ant colony-based classifier yields better accuracy than conventional maximum likelihood classifiers and decision tree classifiers.The overall accuracy of the ACO method is 88.6%,with a Kappa coefficient of 0.861.The decision tree method has an accuracy of 85.4% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.822.The maximum likelihood method has an accuracy of 83.3% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.796.The results clearly support the conclusion that the method explored in this paper can be more effective than conventional classification methods.
机构地区 中山大学
出处 《遥感学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第2期253-262,共10页 NATIONAL REMOTE SENSING BULLETIN
基金 国家杰出青年基金资助项目(编号:40525002) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(编号:40471105) 教育部博士点基金资助项目(编号:20040558023) “985工程”GIS与遥感的地学应用科技创新平台资助项目(编号:105203200400006)
关键词 蚁群算法 遥感影像 分类 人工智能 ant colony optimization remote sensing data classification artificial intelligence
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1[1]Turner B,Meyer W B,Skole D L.Global Landuse/Land-Cover Change:toward an Integrated Study[J].Ambio,1994,23(1):91-95.
  • 2[2]Nishii R,Eguchi S.Supervised Image Classification by Contextual AdaBoost Based on Posteriors in Neighborhoods[J].IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Setsing,2005,43(11):2547-2554.
  • 3[3]Wilkinsom G G,Results and Implications of a Study of Fifteen Years of Satellite Image Classification Experiments[J].IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,2005,43(3):433-440.
  • 4[4]Wilkinsom G G,A Review of Current Issue in the Integration of GIS and Remote Sensing Data[J].International Journal of Geographical Information Science,1996,10(1):85-101.
  • 5[5]Strahler A H.The Use of Prior Probabilities in Maximum Likelihood Classification of Remotely Sensed Data[J].Remote Sensing Environment,1980,10:135-163.
  • 6[6]Frizzelle B G,Moody A.Mapping Continuous Distributions of Land Cover:A Comparison of Maximum-Likelihood Estimation and Artificial Neural Networks[J].Photogrammetry Engineering and Remote Sensing,2001,67(6):693-705.
  • 7[7]Moller-Jansen L.Knowledge-Based Classification of an Urban Area Using Texture and Context Information in Landsat-TM Imagery[J].Photogrammetry Engineering and Remote Sensing,1990,56(6):899-904.
  • 8[8]Srinivasan A,Richards J A.Knowledge Based Techniques for Multi-Source Classification[J].International Journal of Remote Sensing,1990,11(3):505-525.
  • 9[9]Tonjes R,Growe S,Buckner J,et al.Knowledge-Based Interpretation of Remote Semsing Images Using Semantic Nets[J].Photogrammetry Engineering and Remote Sensing,1999,65(7):811-821.
  • 10[10]Heerman P D,Khazenie N.Classification of Multispectral Remote Sensing Data Using a Back Propagation Neural Network[J].IEEE Transaction on Geoscienee and Remote Sensing,1992,30(1):81-88.

同被引文献378

引证文献23

二级引证文献166

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部