7Brint, S. The Future of the City of Intellect[ M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002: x - xxii.
8清华大学.清华大学公报[R].北京:清华大学,2006.
9Boyer, E. L. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate[M ]. [sine loco ] : The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1990:1 - 15.
10Faculty of Arts and Sciences of Harvard University, Report of the Task Force on General Education [ R ]. [ sine loco ] : Harvard University, 2007 : 1 - 3.
2Van RAAN A F J.Advanced bibliometric methods to assess research per-formance and scientific development:basic principles and recent practicalapplications[J].Research Evaluation,1993,3:151-162.
3KOSTOFF R N,ROBERT R R.Schaller,Science and Technology Road-maps[J].IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,2001,48(2):132-141.
4Van RAAN A F J.Scientometrics:State-of-the-art[J].Scientomet-rics,1997,38(1):205-218.
5FOWLER Z.Creativity and education futures:learning in a digital age[J].British Educational Research Journal,2011,37(6):895-896.
6CALDERHEAD J,ROBSON M.Images of teaching:Student teachers’earlyconceptions of classroom practice[J].Teaching and Teacher Education,1991,7(1):1-8.
7FLORIANA L,BLACK-HAWKINS K.Exploring inclusive pedagogy[J].British Educational Research Journal,2011,37(5):813-828.
8EVANSA L.The‘shape’of teacher professionalism in England:profes-sional standards,performance management,professional development andthe changes proposed in the 2010 White Paper[J].British EducationalResearch Journal,2011,37(5):851-870.
