衔接与语篇组织被引量：1

下载PDF

导出

摘要在简要论述衔接和语篇组织这两个语言学概念的基础上,本文探讨了不同种类的衔接关系在语篇组织中发挥作用的方式,说明衔接只是语篇组织的一个方面,而连贯则是人们对于语篇组织的认知结果。

作者徐健

机构地区苏州大学外国语学院

出处《苏州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》北大核心 2007年第5期112-115,共4页 Journal of Soochow University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

基金国家社会科学基金项目"科技语篇中语言评价系统研究"的阶段性成果(项目编号:06xyy013)

关键词衔接语篇组织语篇地位语篇过渡

参考文献16

1[1]Gleason,H.A.Jr.Contrastive analysis in discourse structure[M].Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics 21.Georgetown University Institute of Languages and Linguistics,1968.
2[2]Gutwinski,W.Cohesion in Literary Texts:A Study of Some Grammatical and Lexical Features of English Discourse[M].The Hague:Mouton,1976.
3[3]Halliday,M.A.K.The linguistic study of literary texts[A].In H.G.Lunt (ed).Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists[C].The Hague:Mouton.1964:302-307.
4[4]Halliday,M.A.K.An Introduction to Functional Grammar[M].London:Edward Arnold,1985a.
5[5]Halliday,M.A.K.Dimensions of Discourse:Grammar[A].In van Dijk (ed).Handbook of Discourse Analysis[C].London:Academic Press Inc.(London) Ltd.1985b.
6[6]Halliday,M.A.K.An Introduction to Functional Grannar[M].London:Edward Arnold,1994.
7[7]Halliday,M.A.K.& Hasan,R.Cohesion in English[M].London:Longnan,1976.
8[8]Halliday,M.A.K.& Hasan,R.Language,Context,and Text:Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective[M].Victoria:Deakin University Press,1985.
9[9]Halliday,M.A.K.& Matthiessen C.Construing Experience Through meaning:A Language-based Approach to Cognition[M].London:Cassell,1999.
10[10]Halliday,M.A.K.& Matthiessen C.An Introduction to Functional Grammar (Third edition)[M].London:Edward Arnold,2004.

1[2]Chafe, W. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view [A]. In: C. Li (ed.) Subject and Topic [C]. New York: Academic Press, 1976. 25-55.
2[3]Chomsky, N. Deep structure, surface Structure, and semantic Representation [A]. In D. Steinberg and L. Jakobovitz (eds.) Semantics[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971. 183-216.
3[4]Firbas, J. On defining the theme in functional sentence perspective [J]. Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1 (1964). 267-280.
4[5]Firbas, J. On the concept of communicative dynamism in the theory of Functional Sentence Perspective [J]. Brno Studies in English 7 (1971). 12-47.
5[6]Givón, T. Introduction [A]. In T. Givón (ed.) Topic continuity in discourse [C]. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1983. 5-41.
6[7]Hajicová, E. Topic and Focus [A]. In P. Sgall (ed.) Contributions to Functional Syntax. Semantics and Language Comprehension (LISEE, 16) [C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1984. 189-202.
7[8]Halliday, M. Notes on transitivity and theme in English (part II) [J]. Journal of Linguistics 3 (1967). 199-244.
8[9]Hockett, C. A Course in Modern Linguistics [M]. New York: Macmillan, 1958.
9[10]Jackendoff, R. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar [M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1972.
10[11]Kuboň, P. Information Packaging Revisited. PhD dissertation of Simon Fraser University, 1999. Available through http://fas.sfu.ca/pub/cs/theses/1999/PetrKubonPhD.pdf.

苏州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）

2007年第5期

内容加载中请稍等...