期刊文献+

叙事理论对历史研究的影响——以修昔底德的写作策略为例 被引量:2

The Influence of Narrative Theory on the Studies of History——A Case of Thucydides's Writing Strategy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以修昔底德研究为个案,分别从史学理论界、史学史界和普通史学家群体等三个层次,分析引入者与接受者之间的互动,进而揭示叙事理论对史学界的影响,以及现代史学史上理论与实践的特殊关系。 This paper, based on the studies of Thucydides and the three levels of theory of historiography, history of historiography and historians, gives an analysis of the interaction between introducer and receptor, and further reveals the influence of narrative theory on the community of history as well as the special relationship of theory and practice in modern history of historiography.
作者 李隆国
机构地区 北京大学历史系
出处 《河北学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第1期120-125,共6页 Hebei Academic Journal
关键词 修昔底德 叙事理论 史学实践 现代史学史 Thucydides narrative theory practice of historiography modern history of historiography
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1[1]Nancy Partner.Hayden White (and the content and form and everyone else) at AHA[J].History and Theory,Vol.36,No.4,Dec.1997.
  • 2[2]Alun Munslow.Decongstructing History[M].London:Routledge,1997.
  • 3格奥尔格.伊格尔斯,李丽君.历史编撰学与后现代主义[J].东岳论丛,2004,25(6):24-31. 被引量:3
  • 4[4]Hayden White.The Interpretation in History[J].New Literary History,Vol.41,No.2,Nov.1973.
  • 5[5]Lawrence Stone.the Revival of Narrative:Reflections on a New Old History[J].Past and Present,No.85,Nov.1979.
  • 6[6]海登·怀特.形式的内容:叙事话语与历史再现[M].北京:北京出版社出版集团,2005.
  • 7[7]Richard Vann.the Reception of Hayden White[J].History and Theory,Vol.37,No.2,May.1998.
  • 8[8]Lawrence Stone,Gabrielle M.Spiegel.History and Post-Modernism[J].Past and Present,No.135,May.1992.
  • 9[9]Chareles Foster Smith.Character-Drawing in Thucydides[J].The American Journal of Philology,Vol.24,No.4,1903.
  • 10[10]Francis MacDonald Cornford.Thucydides Mythistoricus[M].Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press,1907.

二级参考文献46

  • 1Reinhart Koselleck.Futures Past.On the Semantic of Historical Time[M].Cambridge,MA,1985.
  • 2Leopold von Ranke.The Theory and Practice of History[M].Georg G.Iggers and Konrad Von Moltke,eds.Indianapolis:Bobbs Merrill,1973.P44,P53,P34;46.
  • 3Cf.Peter Novick.That Noble Dream:The "Objectivity Question" and the American Historical Profession[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1988.
  • 4E.g Ashis Nandy.Historys Forgotten Doubles[J].History and Theory,Theme Issue 34(1995).P44-66.
  • 5Keith Jenkins.The Postmodern History Reader[C].London:Routledge,1997.P4,P6,P36.
  • 6Michel Foucault.Histoire de la folie[M].1961.
  • 7Max Horkheimer,Theodor Adorno.The Dialectic of Enlightenment[M].
  • 8F.R.Ankersmit.Historiography and Postmodernism[A].The Postmodern History Reader[C].P287,P291.
  • 9Hayden White.The Content of the Form:Normative Discourse and Historical Representation[M].Baltimore:John Hopkins University Press,1987.P209,P192.
  • 10White.Metahistory:The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe[M].Baltimore:John Hopkins University Press,1973.P4,P283,Px31.

共引文献56

同被引文献62

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部