摘要
目的了解处于北京不同级别医院的青年医师的生活质量。方法使用SF-36量表对受调查人员进行测试,并与常模比较。结果北京社区医院青年医师在MH项目得分较标准得分差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。青年医师在GH项目得分和标准得分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),在VT、SF和MH项目得分和标准得分差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。青年医师在GH项目得分和北京社区医院得分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),在VT、SF和MH项目得分和北京社区医院得分有极差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论北京社区医院青年医师的生活质量明显好于北京三级甲等医院青年医师。北京三级甲等医院青年医师未处于健康状态。
Objective To assess young doctors' quality of life of different hospitals in Beijing.Methods We used SF-36 to assess the young doctors of different hospitals,and compared with norms.Results There was significant difference in MH(P<0.01)between community hospital and norms.There was significant difference in GH(P<0.05),and more significant difference in VT,SF,and MH(P<0.01)between tertiary Grade A(comprehensive)hospital and norms.There was significant difference in GH(P<0.05),and more significant difference in VT,SF,and MH(P<0.01)between tertiary Grade A(comprehensive)hospital and community hospital.Conclusion Community hospital young doctors' quality of life was better than tertiary Grade A(comprehensive)hospital young doctors'.And tertiary Grade A(comprehensive)hospital young doctors were not health.
出处
《中国实用医药》
2007年第24期31-33,共3页
China Practical Medicine
