期刊文献+

经典原位肝移植术中逆灌注法对移植肝缺血再灌注损伤的影响 被引量:15

Study on the influences of injurys by ischemia and reperfusion to retrograde perfusion in standard orthotopic liver transplantations
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨经典原位肝移植术中逆灌注法对移植肝缺血再灌注损伤的影响。方法35例经典原位肝移植患者随机分为试验组和对照组。试验组17例,采用经下腔静脉逆灌注法,在吻合门静脉前先开放下腔静脉,然后再吻合门静脉、肝静脉;对照组18例,采用常规经门静脉正向灌注法,先开放门静脉,再开放下腔静脉,然后吻合肝动脉。分别测定两组的以下指标:复温缺血时间(RWIT);移植术后1h及术后1、2、3、5、7天血清丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、谷氨酰转肽酶(GGT)、总胆红素(TB)、凝血酶原时间(PT);无肝期结束后2h下腔静脉血中的肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和白细胞介素-1(IL-1)的浓度;无肝期结束后3h取肝组织活检行光镜检查,高倍镜下计算肝细胞水变性及坏死细胞百分比。结果试验组的RWIT显著短于对照组(P<0.05);术后1小时,术后1、2天试验组TB显著低于对照组(P<0.05),术后3、5、7天两组无差异(P>0.05);术后1、2天试验组ALT显著低于对照组(P<0.05),术后1h、术后3、5、7天两组无差异(P>0.05);术后1h,术后1、3天试验组GGT显著低于对照组(P<0.05),术后2、5、7天两组无差异(P>0.05);两组PT术后无差异(P>0.05);无肝期结束后2h,试验组下腔静脉血中TNF-α,IL-l的浓度显著低于对照组(P<0.05);病理组织学检查显示试验组肝细胞缺血再灌注损伤较对照组轻;无肝期结束后3h,试验组肝细胞水变性及坏死细胞百分比显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论经典原位肝移植术中逆灌注法可减轻移植肝缺血再灌注损伤,改善移植肝早期肝功能。 Objective Study on the influences of injurys by ischemia and reperfusion to retrograde perfusion in orthotopic liver transplantations. Methods Thirty five standard orthotopic liver transplantation patients were randomly divided into experimental group and control group. Retrograde perfusion via caval veins were performed in experimental group (17 cases) and normal reperfusions via portal veins were performed in control group (18 cases). The re-warm ischemia time, ALT, GGT, TB and PT in patients' serum were tested in the two groups respectively at one hour, 1 day, 2, 3, 5 and 7 days after operation. Concentrations of TNF-αand IL-1 in the caval veins were also tested two hours after the grafts transplanted into the patients. The ratio of hydropic degeneration and necrotic hepatocytes were detected under the light microscope and the morphologic changes of hepatocytes were detected under light and electro microscope respectively. Results The re-warm ischemia time of experimental group was remarkably shorter than that of control group(P<0.05). For serum TB, the experimental group was remarkably lower than the control group 1 hour, 1 and 2 days after operation(P<0.05), but there were no significant differences between the two groups 3, 5 and 7 days after operation. For serum ALT, the experimental group was remarkably lower than the control group 1 and 2 days after operation(P<0.05), but there were no significant differences between the two groups 1 hour, 3, 5 and 7 days after operation. For serum GGT, the experimental group was remarkably lower than the control group 1hour, 1and 3 days after operation(P<0.05), but there were no significant differences between the two groups 2, 5 and 7 days after operation. For PT, there were no significent differences between the two groups after operation. Concentrations of TNF-αand IL-1 in the caval veins of experimental group were remarkably lower than those of control group two hours after the grafts transplanted into the patients(P<0.05). The injury by ischemia and reperfusion, ratio of hydropic degeneration and hepatocyte necrosis for experimental group were remakably lighter than control group(P<0.05). Conclusion The injurys caused by ischemia and reperfusion might be reduced and the graft functions might be improved by using method of retrograde perfusion in orthotopic liver transplantations.
出处 《中华普通外科学文献(电子版)》 2007年第2期101-105,共5页 Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition)
关键词 经典原位肝移植术 逆行灌注 缺血再灌注损伤 肿瘤坏因子-α standard orthotopic liver transplantation retrograde perfusion reperfusion ischemia and reperfusion injury
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1陈规划,陆敏强,何晓顺,朱晓峰,王国栋,杨扬,蔡常洁,黄洁夫.原位肝移植术后胆道并发症的预防与诊治[J].中华外科杂志,2003,41(1):3-5. 被引量:19
  • 2[2]Starzl TE.Marchioro TL,von Kaulla KH.Homotransplantation of the liver in humans.Surg Gynecol Obstect,1963:117:659
  • 3[3]Massarollo PCB,Mies S,et al.Simultaneous arterianl and portal revascularization in liver transplantation.
  • 4[4]Sankary H,McChesney L,etal.A simple modification in operative technique can reduce the incidence of non-anastomotic biliary strictures after orthotopic liver transplantation,Hepatology,1995,21:63
  • 5[5]Ploeg Fj,D'Allesardro AM,et al.Risk fators for primary dysfunction after live transplantation-a multivariant analysis.Transplantation,1993,55:807-813
  • 6[6]Knicpcissd.IbererF,Grasser B,et al A single-center experience with retrograde reperfusion in liver transplantation.Transpl Int,2003,16(10):730~735
  • 7[7]Yassin MM,Harikin DW,et al Lower limb ischemia-reperfusion injury triggers a systemic inflammatory resporse and multiple organ clysfuntion.World J Surg,2002,26(1):115~121
  • 8[8]Strasbey SM,Howard TK,et al.selecting the clonor liver,risk factors for poor function after orthotopic liver transplantation.Hepatology,1994,20(4):940~941
  • 9[9]Igea J,Nuno J,et al.ammonia levels as early markers of good graft revascularization in hepatic transplantation.Transplant Proc,1999,31(6):245~2446
  • 10[10]Platz KP.Mucller AR,et al.Influence of warm ischemia time on intial graft function in human liver transplantation.Transplant Proc,1997,29(8):3458~3459

二级参考文献8

  • 1Moser MA, Wall WJ. Management of biliary problems after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl, 2001, 7(11 Suppl 2):S46-52.
  • 2Kuo PC, Lewis WD, Stokes K, et al. A comparison of operation,endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography in biliary complications after hepatic transplantation. J Am College Surg,1994,179:177-181.
  • 3Sanchez-Urdazpal L, Gores GL, Ward EM, et al. Ischemic type biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. Hepatology,1992,16:49-53.
  • 4Greif F, Bronsther OL, Thiel DHV, et al. The incidence, ti ming, and management of biliary tract complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. Ann Surg, 1994,219:40-45.
  • 5Margarit C, Hidalgo E, Lazaro JL, et al. Biliary complications secondary to late hepatic artery thrombosis in adult liver transplant patients. Transpl Int, 1998,11 Suppl 1:S251-254.
  • 6Ostroff JW. Post-transplant biliary problems. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2001,11:163-183.
  • 7Randall HB, Wachs ME, Somberg KA, et al. The use of the T tube after orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplantation, 1996,61:258-261.
  • 8陆敏强,陈规划,黄洁夫.不同热、冷缺血时间对供肝胆道保存的影响[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),1998,18(S1):22-24. 被引量:25

共引文献18

同被引文献110

引证文献15

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部