精神分析的本质及其发展的新思路

下载PDF

导出

摘要精神分析理论的争议在于其理论建构过程和方法,以及应用中的概念模糊。这一方面是由它研究对象的性质所决定,另一方面也是出于理解的偏差,但在本质上它是一种在无意识层面干预的心理治疗技术。

作者徐云秦伟

机构地区成都医学院应用心理学教研室四川大学公共管理学院

出处《文教资料》 2006年第15期218-,198,共2页

关键词精神分析本质心理治疗技术

参考文献5

1[2]Kandel ER.A new intellectual framework for psychiatry.Am J Psychiatry,1998,155(4):457-469.
2[3]Kandel ER.Biology and the Future of Psychoanalysis:A New Intellectual Framework for Psychiatry Revisited.Am J Psychiatry,1999,156(4):505-524.
3郭庆科,孟庆茂.罗夏墨迹测验在西方的发展历史与研究现状[J].心理科学进展,2003,11(3):334-338. 被引量：20
4[5]恩斯特·贝克尔.拒斥死亡[M].林和生译.北京:华夏出版社,2000.
5[6]Freud,S.Project for a Scientific Psychology (1895).In:Standard Edition,Vol I,Strachey,J Ed.London:The Hogarth Press,1950:295-390.

1[1]Rouse T,Kaser-Boyd N,Maloney M P. Essential of the Rorschach Assessment. Join Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2000. 141
2[3]Exner J E. The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1991. 10~40
3[4]Exner J E, Weiner I B. The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System. Volume 3: Assessment of children and adolescents (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1995. 50~60
4[5]Watkins C E, Campbell V L, Nieberding R, Hanmark R. Contemporary practice of psychological assessment by psychologists,Professional Psychology, 1995, 26: 54~60
5[6]Embretson S E, Hershberger S L. New Rules of Measurement Lawrence Eribaum Associate, Inc, 1999. 153~159
6[7]Parker K C, Hanson R K, Hunsley J. MMPI,Rorschach and WAIS:A meta-analytic comparison of reliability,stability and validity. Psychological Bulletin, 1988, 103: 367~373
7[8]Weiner J B. Some observations on the validity of the Rorschach Inkblot Method. Psychological Assessment, 1997, 8(2): 206~213
8[9]Meyer G J, Archer R P. The hard science of Rorschach research:What do we know and where do we go? Psychological Assessment, 2001, 13(4): 486~502
9[10]McClelland D C, Kostner R, Weinberger J. How do implicit and self-attributed motives differ? Psychological Review, 1989, 96: 690~702
10[11]Stricker G, Gold J R. The Rorschach: toward a non-methodically based, idiographically applicable configurational model Psychological Assessment, 1999, 11(3): 240~250

文教资料

2006年第15期

内容加载中请稍等...