摘要
东航返航、重庆出租罢运再一次把罢工权推到了风头浪尖上,将罢工权纳入宪法的呼声再一次响起。罢工权作为第二代基本人权,在我国宪法史上的起起落落和政治考虑密切相关,在政治经济环境大改变的今天是否必须将罢工权写入宪法,颇有争议。从"未列举基本权利的保护""对宪法条文解读"两个方面分析,可以看出罢工权在宪法中已经隐性存在,无须再予以规定。
Eastern Airlines return,taxis strike in chongqing drive the strike right to the top wave again,people request the strike right into constitution once again.As the second generation of the basic human rights,the fluctuation of strike right in constitution is connected with policy,is it necessary to write it in constitution in such a changing situation? The article analyzes it from two aspects: "the protection of non-listed fundamental rights" and "interpret the provisions of the constitution",considering the...
出处
《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》
2009年第5期13-15,共3页
Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
关键词
罢工权
未列举基本权利
隐性存在
劳动权
the strike right
non-listed fundamental rights
implicit existence
labor right