实证路向视角下的民族法学与社会法学的学科关系

The Relationship Between Ethic Law Studies and Sociological Jurisprudence from an Empirical View

民族法学与社会法学学科都倾向实证调查研究方法,在研究对象和进路方面有交叉融合之处。但因学科体系不同,民族法学一般采用深入的描述性的民族志方式,主要关注法秩序问题,而社会法学往往倾向于采用中等或者大规模的对象调查方式,其关注的领域比民族法学广阔。从学术为现实服务的功能看,社会法学比民族法学的作用更强一些。此外,由于社会法学积极采用网络、数理统计等技术路线和方法,以描述性为主、主观分析内容较多,其客观性与科学性似乎更为社会所认同,结论和成果也更容易被决策部门和社会大众所接受。

Both the discipline of ethic law studies and the discipline of sociological jurisprudence tend to use empirical investigations. Ethic law studies are more descriptive in details, mainly in the form of ethnography, focusing chiefly on legal order. Sociological jurisprudence uses larger-scale investigations for a wider field of study, and so may provide more social services than ethic law studies. In addition, the findings of sociological jurisprudence are more likely to be accepted as they are dominated by d...