3Berg, E. C. The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality[J]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1999(8) : 215-241.
4Bruner, J. Vygotsky : A historical and conceptual perspective[ A]. In Wertsch, J. (ed.). Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives[ C]. London: Cambridge University Press, 1985:46-48.
5Hyland, F. Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback[J]. System, 2003, 31(2) : 217-230.
6Jonannessen, L. R. & McCam, T. It Can't be This Difficult: Peer Revision Activities. In Case You Teach English: An Interactive Casebook for Prospective and Practicing Teachers [ M ]. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall, 2002:56.
7Kamimura, T. Effects of peer feedback on EFL students writers at different levels of En$1ish proficiency: A Japanese context[J].TESL Canada Journal, 2006,23(2) : 12-36.
8Leki, I. Potential problems with peer responding in ESL writing classes [J]. CATESOL Journal, 1990(3) : 5-17.
9Lewis, R. , Berghoff, P. , & Pheeney, P. Focusing students: Three approaches for learning through evaluation [ J ]. Innovative Higher Educa, tion, 1999, 23(3) : 181-196.
10Long, M. H. Input, interaction, and second language acquisition[D]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UCLA, Department of Applied Linguistics and TESL, 1980 : 1-96.
