期刊文献+

瘢痕形成的分子机制初探:瘢痕组织与成人正常皮肤中EGFR与FGFR2表达差异的对比 被引量:1

A comparison study of EGFR and FGFR2 in normal skin and scar tissue
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察瘢痕组织及正常皮肤中的表皮生长因子受体与成纤维细胞生长因子受体在细胞膜上表达的差异。方法标本来自烧伤后需做整形手术的病人,对照选自同一病人的供皮区。选用表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)与成纤维细胞生长因子受体(FGFR)的特异性抗体,对皮肤标本进行免疫组织化学染色,光镜下观察它们的变化。结果正常皮肤与瘢痕组织中都有表皮生长因子受体与成纤维细胞生长因子受体染色阳性的细胞,而瘢痕中的数目明显多于正常皮肤中的表达。结论瘢痕组织和正常皮肤中,表皮生长因子受体染色与成纤维细胞生长因子受体染色存在的差异是造成瘢痕愈合的重要因素之一。 :Objective To observe the expression characteristics of EGFR and FGFR2 between normal skin and scar tissue, in an attempt to probe the molecule mechanism of scar formation. Method The samples of scar tissue and normal skin were taken from incised scar and donor site of patients undergoing plastic operation in our burn unit, respectively. EGFR and FGFR2 were used as the biochemical markers for reparative cells. Immunohistochemistry staining technique was employed to monoclonal antibody to determine the expression of different epithelial cells markers. The positive cells of normal skin and scar tissue were investigated with light microscope. Result There were EGFR-and FGFR2-antibody immunoreactivition positive cells in normal skin and scar tissue, but the protein levels of EGFR-and FGFR2 expression have apparent difference, the number of immunoreactivition positive cells were found in scar tissue were stronger than in normal skin. Conclusion There are the inherent differences of EGFR and FGFR2 antibody immunoreactivition positive staining in cells of scar tissue and normal skin, membrana receptor may be play an essential role of cicatricial healing.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 2001年第20期66-67,共2页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
基金 国家重大基础研究规划资助项目(G1999054204) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(39870731) 国家杰出青年科学基金资助课题(39525024)
关键词 表皮生长因子受体 成纤维细胞生长因子受体 瘢痕 :epidermal growth factor receptor fibroblast growth factor receptor;scar
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献2

共引文献4

同被引文献25

  • 1程飙,付小兵,盛志勇,孙同柱,孙晓庆,李建福.创伤修复中细胞信号传递对瘢痕形成的影响:SH2功能领域蛋白酪氨酸磷酸酶的表达及意义[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2001,10(22):50-51. 被引量:4
  • 2Longaker MT, Adziek NS. The biology of fetal wound healing: a review. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1991, 87: 788-798.
  • 3Longaker MT, Whitby D J, Ferguson MWJ, et al. Adult skin wounds in the fetal environment heal with scar formation. Ann Surg, 1994, 219:65-72.
  • 4Chin GS, Kim WJH, Lee TY, et al. Differential expression of receptor tyrosine kinases and Shc in fetal and adult rat fibroblasts: ward defining scarless versus scarring fibroblast phenotypes. Plast Reconstr Surg,2000, 105: 972-979.
  • 5Ferguson MW, Whitby D J, Shah M, et al. Scar formation: the spectral nature of fetal and adult wound repair. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1996, 97:854-860.
  • 6Rowlatt U. Intrauterine wound healing in a 20 week human fetus. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol, 1979, 381:353-361.
  • 7Chin GS, Liu W, Steinbrech D, et al. Cellular signaling by tyrosine phosphorylation in keloid and normal human dermal fibroblasts. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2000, 106: 1532-1540.
  • 8Marcus JR, Tyrone JW, Bonomo S, et al. Cellular mechanisms for diminished scarring with aging. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2000, 105: 1591-1599.
  • 9Lee NJ, Wang SJ, Durairaj KK, et al. Increased expression of transforming growth-β1, acidic fibroblast growth factor, and basic fibroblast growth factor in fetal versus adult fibroblast cell lines. Laryngos, 2000,110: 616-619.
  • 10Stone DK. Receptors: structure and function. Am J Med, 1998, 105:244-250.

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部