2[3]AKIYAMA M,ISHIBASLI T,YAMADA T,et al.Low-frenqency ulrasound penetrates the cranium and enhances thrombolysis in vitro[J].Neurosurgery,1998,43(4):828-832:discussion 832-833.
3[4]BRADNOCK B,LAW HT,ROSCOE K.A quantitative comparative assessment of the immoediate response to high freqency ultrasound and low freqency ultrasound(Longwave Therapy)in the treatment of ankle sprains[J].Physiotherapy,1996,82(2):78-84.
5[7]REHER P,DOAN N,BRADNOCK B,et al.Therapeutic ultrasound for ostoradionecrosis:an in vitro comparision between 1 MHz and 45 kHz machines[J].Eur J Cancer,1998,34(12):1962-1968.
6[8]DOAN N,REHER P,MEGHJI S,et al.In vitro effects of therapeutic ultrasound on cell proliferation,protein synthesis,and cytokine production by human fibroblasts,osteoblasts,and monocytes[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1999,57(4):409-419.
7[9]OLSSON SB,JOHANSSON B,NISSON AM,et al.Enhancement of thrombolysis by ultrasound[J].Ultrasound Med Biol,1994,20:375-382.
8[10]NILSSON AM,ODSELIUS R,ROIJER A,et al.Pro and antifibrinoltic effects of Ultrasound on streptokinase-induced thrombolysis[J].Ultrasound Med Biol,1995,21:833-840.
9[11]LUO H,NISHIOKA T,FISHBEIN MC,et al.Transcutaneous ultrasound arguments lysis of arterial thrombi in vivo[J].Circulation,1996,94(4):775-778.
10[12]NISHIOKA T,LUO H,FISHBEIN MC,et al.Dissolution of thrombotic arterial occlusion by high intensity,low freqency ultrasound and dodecafluoropentane emulsion:an in vitro and in vivo study[J].J AM Coll Cardiol,1997,30(2):561-568.
1Suchkova V, Siddiqi FN, Carstensen EL, et al. Enhancement of fib rinolysis with 40-kHz ultrasound [J]. Circulation, 1998, 98 (10): 1030-5.
2Riggs PN, Francis CW, Bartos RS, et al. Ultrasound enhancement of rabbit femoral artery thrombolysis [J]. Cardiovasc Surg, 1997, 5(2): 201-7.
3Birnbaum Y, Luo H, Nagai T, et al. Noninvasive in vivo clot dissolution without a thrombolytic drug [J]. Circu lation, 1998, 97(2): 130-4.
4Porter TR, Xie F. Ultrasound, microbub bles, and thrombolysis [J]. Pro cardio vasc Dis, 2001, 44(1): 101-10.
5Nishioka T, Luo H, Fishbein MC, et al. Dissolution of thrombotic arterial oc clusion by high intensity low freqttency ultrasound and dodecafluoropentane emulsion: in vitro and in vivo study[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1997, 30(2): 561-8.
6Sakuma T, Leong-Poi H, Fisher NG, et al. Further insights into the no-reflow phenomenon after primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarc tion: the role of microthromboemboli [J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2003, 16(1): 15-21.
8Porter T, Kricsfeld D, Li S, et al. Comparison of d-dimer activity and residual particle size produced following thrombus disruption by perfluorocarbon containing microbubbles versus urokinase in thepresence of low frequency ultrasound [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998,31(2): 219.
9Suchkova V, Carstensen EL, Francis CW. Ultrasound enhancement of fibrinolysis at frequencies of 27 to 100 kHz Ultrasound Med Biol[J]. 2002, 28(3): 377-82.
10Mitragotri S, Edwards DA, Blankschtein D, et al. Amechanistic study of ultrasonically enhanced transdermal drug delivery [ J ]. PharmSci, 1995,84(6) :697 -706.
