期刊文献+

核电站概率安全分析中人因事件的风险重要性 被引量:14

Risk importance of human events in the probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants
原文传递
导出
摘要 对核电站概率安全分析模型中人因事件的风险重要性进行了讨论。岭澳核电站风险重要的前 5 0个最小割集中 ,包含人因事件的有 2 8个 ,占总堆芯熔化频率的 39.1%。讨论了两个风险重要度 :割集重要度 (Fussell- Vesely im -portance,FV)和风险增加当量 (risk achievem ent worth,RAW)得到的 North Anna核电站单个电站审查中风险重要人因事件特点。FV重要度前 10位人因事件都为事故后人因事件 ;RAW重要度前 10位人因事件中包括发生概率较低的事故前人因事件和发生概率较高的事故后人因事件。 The risk importance of human events in nuclear power plant probabilistic safety assessment models was analyzed. The LingAo assessment model results show that in the first 50 risk important minimal cut sets, 28 involved human events, accountting for 39.1% of the core damage frequency. The characteristics of risk important human events in the North Anna individual plant examination were analyzed based on the Risk Achievement Worth and the Fussell-Vesely importance. All of the first 10 human events of the Fussell-Vesely importance are post-initiator human events. The first 10 human events of the Rish Achievement Worth include both pre-initiator human events with relatively low possiblity and post-initiator human events with relatively high possibility. These characteristics can be used to design prevention and limitation measures.
出处 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第6期748-750,共3页 Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)
基金 清华大学核能技术设计研究院基础研究基金项目( 0 91110 40 3 )
关键词 核反应堆安全 概率安全分析 人因事件 割集重要度 风险增加当量 nuclear reactor safety probabilistic safety assessment human events Fussell-Vesely importance risk achievement worth
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1IAEA.Human Reliability Analysis in Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants,A Safety Practice [R].IAEA Safety Series No.50-P-10,1995.
  • 2Nuclear Energy Agency,Critical Operator Actions:Human Reliability Modeling and Data Issues [R].NEA/CSNI/R(98)1,1998.227-236.
  • 3Werner W F,Hirano M,Kondo S,et al.Results and insights from level-1 probabilistic safety assessments for nuclear power plants in France,Germany,Japan,Sweden,Switzerland and the United States [J].Reliability Eng and Syst Safety,1995,48:165-179.
  • 4广东核电合营有限公司.岭奥核电站PSA报告 [R].广东核电合营有限公司,2000.Guangdong Nuclear Power Joint Venture Company LTD.PSA Report of Ling'ao Nuclear Power Plant [R].Guangdong Nuclear Power Joint Venture Company LTD,2000.(in Chinese)
  • 5Borst M V,Schoonakker H.An overview of PSA importance measures [J].Reliability Eng and Syst Safety,2001,72:241-245.
  • 6Youngblood R W.Risk significance and safety significance [J].Reliability Eng and Syst Safety,2001,73:121-136.
  • 7Virginia Electric and Power Company.Probabilistic Risk Assessment for the Individual Plant Examination Final Report North Anna Power Station Units 1 and 2 [R].Virginia Electric and Power Company,1992.

同被引文献90

引证文献14

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部