关于权利是否具有顺序性的思辨

Thinking on Rights' Precedence

文章认为权利是需要救济和保护,在权利救济时,事实上存在着权利位序的问题,文章从对一个千年的哲学例证的诠释开始,证明作为权利的所有者的人的天然的取舍驱动是权利具有位序性的根本。其次,认为基本权利与非基本权利划分是权利具有位序性的显著证明。最后,是通过权利冲突的实际解决来证明权利之间存在的位序性。

The authors think that rights need relief and protection. When providing relief, there is a question of rights' precedence. This article begins with an annotation on philosophical example of thousands of years ago, that proves that rights' owners' natural drive to choose, is the foundation of the rights' precedence. Second, the delimitation between fundamental and unfundamental rights is the obvious evidence of the rights' precedence. Finally, the authors provide practical solutions to the right conflicts, which serves as the proof of the rights' precedence.