期刊文献+

第三方物流服务商特征属性的前沿评价 被引量:19

Nonparametric Frontiers Evaluation of Eigenvalue Attributes of Third-Party Logistics Providers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了设计一个适合第三方物流服务商的评价方法,建立了15个分类指标的评价指标体系,其中每个指标划分为5个等级,依据第三方物流服务商的绩效水平确定其所处等级,得到原始评价值.将备选服务商的同一分类指标的原始评价值两两比较,求出15个分类指标下服务商的相对优先矩阵,对每个相对优先矩阵计算其特征属性向量,然后采用限定分类指标权重顺序的非参数前沿绩效评估方法对服务商进行评价,得到第三方物流服务商的优先排序向量,为企业选择第三方物流服务商提供依据.最后,设计了2个算例,对算法的可靠性进行验证. To design an evaluation method for third-party logistics providers (3PLPs) , an evaluation system consisting of 15 classification criteria was proposed, and its each criterion was graded into 5 levels. Three steps are included in evaluating the third-party logistics providers (3PLPs). The first is to give all the 3PLP candidates a score one by one for each criterion, varying from the highest 5 to the lowest 1. The second is to compare two 3PLP candidates with a classification criterion each time, and after all the candidates have been taken into account, 15 relative priority matrixes can be obtained and their eigenvalue attribute vectors can also be computed. The third is to design a nonparametric frontier algorithm with a constraint of an ordered set of preference weights for the classification criteria, so a sorted priority vector of the 3PLP candidates can be gained by using this algorithm to provide enterprises with an evidence for selecting a 3PLP. At the end, 2 verifying cases were designed to validate the reliability of the evaluation model.
出处 《西南交通大学学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2004年第4期525-530,共6页 Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(59990470 4) 国家自然科学基金海外杰出青年基金B类资助项目(70028102)
关键词 数据包络分析 DEA 特征属性 第三方物流服务商 3PLP 评价指标体系 评价方法 evaluation data envelopment analysis (DEA) eigenvalue attribute third-party logistics provider (3PLP)
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1沈绍基.中国物流市场供求状况分析报告[J].物流科技,2000,23(2):3-14. 被引量:27
  • 2[2]Christopher M, Juttner U. Developing strategic partnerships in the supply chain: a practitioner perspective[J]. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 2000, 6(2): 117-127.
  • 3刘庆斌.企业电子商务物流体系的综合评价[J].中国流通经济,2001,15(3):9-11. 被引量:7
  • 4王峥,王玲,张列平.物资流通企业总体评价指标体系[J].铁道物资科学管理,2000,18(3):20-21. 被引量:5
  • 5[3]吴清一.物流基础[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2000:13.
  • 6[6]包建民. 物流现代化[M]. 上海:上海交通大学出版社,1997. 132-145.
  • 7黎青松,叶怀珍,袁庆达.企业物流战略系统评价的ANP方法[J].物流技术与应用,2000,5(2):32-34. 被引量:6
  • 8[8]Ackerman K. How to choose a third-party logistics provider[J]. Material Handling Management, 2000, 55(3): 95-100.
  • 9[9]Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhods E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429-444.
  • 10[10]Banker R D, Charnes A, Cooper W W. Some models for estimating technological and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis[J]. Management Science, 1984, 30(9): 1 078-1 092.

二级参考文献2

  • 1菊池康也 丁立言(译).物流管理[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1999..
  • 2汪诚义.模糊数学引论[M].北京工业学院出版社,1998..

共引文献43

同被引文献202

引证文献19

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部