法条竞合视野下的伪证罪与诬告陷害罪

Perjury Crime And Implication Crime Under The View of Concurrence of Rules

传统犯罪构成四分论在区别伪证罪与诬告陷害罪这一重要问题上 ,引发了诸多争议。因此有必要对此作进一步的阐述 ,确保法官能够在刑事司法实践中正确的定罪和量刑。在比较和研究国内外相关理论的基础上可以发现 ,法条竞合理论中的交叉理论对这一问题具有重要指导意义 。

The quartered separating method of traditional criminal constitution distinguishes perjury crime and implication crime, which brings about a lot of disputes. So, it is necessary to set forth this further in order to enable judges to convict a crime and sentence a criminal correctly in criminal justice practice. Comparing and studying the relevant theories at home and abroad, the author thinks that the concurrence of rules theory may and should be an important guiding one in making out the differences of the two crimes.