摘要
中日两国之间有关钓鱼岛的争端主要涉及岛屿主权归属和东海海洋权益两个方面。从国际法的原则来看 ,钓鱼岛的主权属于中国。中国最先发现并获得其主权 ,日本所主张的“无主地先占”的原则根本不能成立。美日之间的和约或协定也不具备决定钓鱼岛主权归属的法律效力。根据《联合国海洋法公约》的有关规定以及国际司法判例 ,钓鱼岛不应享有大陆架和专属经济区 ,亦不具有划界效力。中日两国在东海大陆架的划定问题上应该遵循公平和自然延伸的原则 ,达到最为公正合理的划界效果。
The conflicts about Diao-Yu Islands between China and Japan mainly concerned with two aspects: island sovereignty and sea rights. From the principles in International law, the sovereign right of Diao-Yu Island belongs to China. China firstly discovered the island and possessed its sovereignty. The “terra nullius'principle advocated by Japan is untenable. The treaties and agreements signed by Japan and US have had no legal effect to decide the sovereign right of Diao-Yu Island. According to the rules in UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and some international cases, Diao-Yu Island has no right to possess Continental Shelf and Exclusive Economic Zone, and it also has zero effect in delimitation. In order to achieve the most reasonable result, China and Japan should obey the Equity Principle and Natural Prolongation Principle to delimitate the Continental Shelf in East China Sea.
出处
《时代法学》
2004年第3期6-12,共7页
Presentday Law Science
关键词
岛屿主权
海洋权益
公平原则
自然延伸原则
island sovereignty
sea rights
Equity Principle
Natural Prolongation Principle
