气管内间断湿化法与输液管持续湿化法效果比较

Effect Comparison of Trachea Interval Moisture and Trachea Continuous Moisture by Infusion Tube

目的 比较气管内间断湿化法与输液管持续湿化法的临床效果。 方法 实验组 5 0例气管切开病人应用输液管持续湿化 ,对照组 5 0例用气管内间断湿化进行回顾性对照研究。 结果 实验组痰痂形成、发生刺激性咳嗽、气道黏膜出血的例数明显少于对照组 (P<0 .0 1 ) ,肺部感染发生率亦低于对照组 (P<0 .0 5 )。 结论 输液管持续气道湿化可以明显减少痰痂形成、刺激性咳嗽。

Objective To compare the clinical effect of trachea interval moisture and trachea continuous moisture by infusion tube. Method Experimental group(50 patients with tracheotomy) received trachea continuous moisture by infusion tube. Control group(50 patients with tracheotomy) received trachea interval moisture as retrospective comparison. Result The number of patients who had dry sputum ,stimulative cough and trachea mucosal bleeding in experimental group was less than that in control group(P<0 01) .The occurring rate of lung infection of experimental group was lower than that of contral group too(P<0 05). Conclusion Trachea continuous moisture by infusion tube can reduce dry sputum ,stimulative cough , trachea mucosal bleeding and lung infection occurrence.