摘要
克里普克以个体本质的起源说支持严格指示词理论,麦克金则对起源说予以较充分的哲学论证。但起源说在非生物个体上的应用后果极其苛刻,以至难以为人接受;麦克金的本质主义论证实际上或者是前提错误的,或者是不足道的。虽如此,一种反证法确保了起源满足成为个体本质的必要条件,显而易见它也不满足成为个体本质的充分条件。
Kripke made use of the doctrine of origin to support his theory of rigid designator,and McGinn proposed a more sufficient philosophical argument for the doctrine of origin.But the consequences of the doctrine of origin s applications in abiotic things are too rigor for people to accept,while McGinn s essentialism argument either has a false premise or is trivial.For all that,a reductio ad absurdum guarantees that origins satisfy the necessary conditions of being individual essence,but it is evident that ori...
出处
《自然辩证法通讯》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第1期22-27,126,共7页
Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"逻辑哲学重大问题研究"(05JJD720.40002)
江苏省教育厅哲学社会科学基金项目"可能世界理论研究"(06SJD720028)
江苏省"青蓝工程"阶段性成果
关键词
个体本质
起源说
构造说
同一性
延续性
Individual essence
the Doctrine of origin
the Doctrine of structure
Identity
Continuity