改良De Vega环缩术治疗重度三尖瓣返流的疗效分析

The Efficacy of Modified De Vega Technique Compares with the Traditional De Vega Technique for the Correction of Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation

目的:探讨改良De Vega环缩术与经典De Vega环缩术相比对于治疗重度三尖瓣返流是否具有更好的成形效果。方法:2007年12月至2009年3月对29例重度三尖瓣返流的患者行De Vega环缩术。其中16例行改良De Vega环缩术,13例行经典De Vega环缩术,随访比较两组患者三尖瓣返流程度,右心室舒张期末内径,EF值及心功能分级。以秩和检验分析研究两组患者三尖瓣返流程度和心功能分级的差异,以t检验研究两组患者右心室舒张末期内径及EF值变化。结果:术前两组患者一般指标无显著差异。两组患者随访时间无显著差异。随访经典DeVega组重度返流1例,中度返流5例,轻度返流5例,微量及无返流2例;改良De Vega组无中、重度返流,轻度返流8例,微量及无返流8例。经分析显示两组患者三尖瓣返流程度结果差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。经典De Vega组心功能分级I级5例,II级7例,III级1例;改良De Vega组I级7例,II级8例,III级1例,两组患者心功能差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者右室舒张期末内径及EF值组内比较随访与术前差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),随访时组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),改良De Vega环缩术随访时右室舒张期末内径缩小更显著,射血分数改善更明显。结论:改良De Vega环缩术治疗重度三尖瓣返流效果优于经典De Vega环缩术。

Objective: To compare the efficacy of one kind of modified De Vega technique and traditional De Vega technique for the correction of severe tricuspid regurgitation.Methods: From December 2007 to March 2009,29 patients were treated with tricuspid valve annuloplasty.These were 16 patients in modified De Vega annuloplasty group and the others(13 patients) in traditional De Vega annuloplasty group.The grade of tricuspid regurgitation、New York Heart Association(NYHA) functional class、ejection fraction(EF) and th...