摘要
著作权法第17条文字表述的矛盾,导致我国存在委托创作合同是书面合同还是非书面合同的争论。两种观点虽各有理由,但均有偏颇。我国委托创作合同属于混合形式更为合理,即有关著作权归属的约定法律要求书面形式,其他条款则形式自由。区别形式是由立法的目的决定的,委托创作合同的普通条款只在当事人之间生效;而著作权归属关系到公共利益,书面形式可以起到权利公示作用,弥补著作权登记制度缺失的遗憾。
The contradiction in the textual representation of Article 17 in Chinese Copyright Law brings about the controversy about whether contracts of commissioned works are written contracts or nonwritten contracts.Both views are reasonable but biased.It is appropriate the contracts of commissioned works belonging to mixed form,namely,the agreement law on the ownership of copyright requires the written form and the other articles adopt the principle of freedom.The mixed forms are decided by the legislative purpose...
出处
《经济经纬》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第6期153-156,共4页
Economic Survey
关键词
委托创作合同
形式强制
混合形式
权利公示
contract of commissioned works
mandatory form
mixed form
publicity of rights
