期刊文献+

语言输入假说评析 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 关于语言输入在第二语言习得中的作用,不同的输入观对其有不同的看法。本文首先介绍了三种不同的输入观,在此基础上,又重点介绍了Krashen的语言输入假说,对其在理论上的争论作了客观的总结与评析。
作者 王全义
出处 《天津市经理学院学报》 2009年第6期47-48,共2页 Journal of Tianjin Manager College
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献14

  • 1[1]Ellis,R.Understanding Second Language Acquisition[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press.1985
  • 2[2]Ellis,R.The Study of Second Language Acquisition[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press.1994
  • 3[3]Krashen,S.The Input Hypothesis:Issues and Implications[M].London:Longman,1985
  • 4Ellis,R.Instructed Second Language Acquisition[]..1990
  • 5Pienemann.Psychological Constraintson the Teachabilityof Languages[].First and Second Language AcquisitionProcess.1987
  • 6Swain,M.Communicative Competence:Some Roles of Comprehensi-ble Input and Comprehensible Outputin in Its Development[].Input and Second Language Acquisition.1985
  • 7White,Lydia.Second Language Acquisition andUniversal Grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 12: 121-33 . 1990
  • 8Ellis,R,& X.He.The Role of Modified Input and Output in the Incidental Acquisition of Word Meanings[].Studies in Second Language Acquisition.1999
  • 9Izumi,S,Bigelow,M,Fearnow,S.Testing the output hypothesis:Effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition[].Studies in Second Language Acquisition.1999
  • 10Long,M.H.Does second language instruction make a difference? A Review of Research[].Tesol Quarterly.1983

共引文献26

同被引文献22

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部