期刊文献+

科技论文编辑加工中的批判性思维 被引量:1

On the Critical Thinking in Editing and Processing of Scientific Papers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 科技编辑在编辑加工过程中,往往自觉或不自觉地运用批判性思维方法,对科学研究成果进行分析和评价。科技编辑掌握和运用批判性思维方法时应注意:不受作者的个人属性和社会属性的影响,敢于提出问题;克服"权威决定论"的不良影响;注意发现新观念,培植"科学新人";尊重作者的辛勤劳动成果;认真学习知识,掌握实际技能。 The essence of critical thinking is a thinking based on conscious and creative process through initiative thinking and active inquiry.It plays a very important role in scientific innovation.Editors of sci-tech papers usually employ critical thinking,consciously or unconsciously,to analyze and evaluate authors scientific research results.While doing editing work,they tend to constantly ask some questions in their mind like: While critical thinking is employed in editing the scientific papers,editors should ...
作者 赵金文
出处 《扬州教育学院学报》 2009年第4期88-90,共3页 Journal of Yangzhou College of Education
关键词 批判性思维 科学创新 科学评价 科技论文 编辑加工 critical thinking scientific innovation science evaluation scientific paper editing and processing
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献16

  • 1Ennis, Robert. "Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception. "Teaching Philosophy 14 ( 1 ) . 1991.6.
  • 2Scriven, Michael and Paul, Richard. A Working Definition of ritical Thinking http ://www. sonama, edu/CThink/definect. html.1995.12.6; Paul, Richard. Critical Thinking: Basic Questions and Answers http ://www, sonoma. edu/cthink/
  • 3Bailin, Sharon, Roland Case, Jerrold Coombs, and LeRoi Daniels. "Operationalizing Critical Thinking: ACurriculum, Instruction and Assessment Model." Paper adapted from Bailin et al. , "A Conception of CriticalThinking for Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment," funded by the British Columbia Ministry of Education and Minister responsible for Multiculturalism and Human Rights, May 1993.2.298.
  • 4H. Siegel. Educating Reason: Retionality , Critical Thinking and Education. New Yourk: Routledge. 1988.23.34.
  • 5Fans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. Foundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 1996. 186.
  • 6R. H. Johnson. The Problem of Defining Critical Thinking. In S. Norris (ed.), The Generalizability of Critical Thinking ( New York: Teachers College Press. 1992.49.
  • 7Alec Fisher and Michael Scriven. Critical Thinking. Its Definition and Assessment. Point Reyes, CA:Edgepress. 1997.20.
  • 8Kees De Glopper. Argumentation. Vol. 16.2002. 247 -251.
  • 9Facione, Peter A.. Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction ( executive summary). In The Delphi Report, Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press. 1990.
  • 10转引赵鑫珊.科学·艺术·哲学断想[M].北京:三联书店,1985年.

共引文献76

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部