期刊文献+

“保护”与“保障”的差距——论“严打”刑事政策与罪刑法定原则 被引量:1

The Difference between “Protection”and “Insurance”——On the Criminal Policy of “Strike Hard”and the Principle of Convicting Criminal and Penalty by Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “严打”是我国长期推行的一项刑事政策 ,该项政策注重刑法的社会保护功能 ,强调刑法对犯罪的惩罚 ,从而在一定程度上忽视了对人权的保障 ,这与刑法的罪刑法定原则提倡的刑法价值有所冲突。文章从罪刑法定原则与“严打” Strike Hard”has been carried out as a criminal policy for a long time in China.It lays stress on social protective function of criminal law and emphasizes the punishment of criminal law to crime.Thereby it neglects the insurance to human rights. There lies certain contradictions between it and criminal law value advocated in the principle of convicting criminal and penalty by law.The essay launches a discussion on the value tendencies contained in the principle of convicting criminal and penalty by law and the criminal policy of “Strike Hard”.
作者 李皛
机构地区 华东政法学院
出处 《山西警官高等专科学校学报》 2003年第1期52-55,共4页 Journal of Shanxi Pollce Academy
关键词 "严打" 社会保护 罪刑法定原则 人权保障 Strike Hard” social protection principle of convicting criminal and penalty by law insurance of human rights
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

共引文献253

同被引文献24

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部