期刊文献+

论句法层概念化的机制与层次 被引量:1

On the Mechanism and Hierarchy of Syntactic-level Conceptualization
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文在JanNuyts提出的事态性范畴层阶的基础上,采用角色与参照语法的句法层级图,较为系统地勾画了句法层面概念化的机制和层次。本文认为,宏观句法层面的概念化分为句子层、小句层、中心层和核心层,这一分类亦得到儿童语言发展的证明;微观句法层面概念化分为主观层和客观层,各层均由不同数量的语法算子构成。句法层面的概念化是各种语法算子概念化值的总和,概念化的本质特性是计量性和合成性。 Based on the qualificational categories of states of affairs proposed by Jan Nuyts (2009),this article,within the framework of Layered Syntactic Structure of Role and Reference Grammar,constructs the mechanism and hierarchy of syntactic-level conceptualization. This article argues that macro-syntactic conceptualization consists of sentence,clause,core and nuclear levels,which is evidenced with child language development; micro-syntactic conceptualization consists of subjective and objective levels,each of w...
作者 刘晓林
机构地区 重庆三峡学院
出处 《当代外语研究》 2010年第8期48-53,63,共7页 Contemporary Foreign Language Studies
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献156

  • 1沈家煊.词义与认知——《从词源学到语用学》评介[J].外语教学与研究,1997,29(3):77-79. 被引量:42
  • 2沈家煊.R.W.Langacker的“认知语法”[J].当代语言学,1994(1):12-20. 被引量:174
  • 3D. Geerarts and H. Cuyekens (2007) Oxford Handbook of Cognitive linguistics, Oxford: OUP, 543-565.
  • 4Auwera, Johan van der & Jan Nuyts. 2007. Cognitive linguistics and linguistic typology. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens, eds., Handbook of cognitive linguistics, 1074-1091. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 5Barlow, Michael. 1996. Corpora for theory and practice. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 1: 1-37.
  • 6Barlow, Michael & Suzanne Kemmer, eds. 2000. Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI.
  • 7Barsalou, Lawrence & Christopher Hale. 1993 Components of conceptual representation: From feature lists to recursive frames. In I. Van Meehelen, J. Hampton, R. Michalski & P. Theuns, eds., Categories and concepts, 97 -144. London: Academic Press.
  • 8Berman, Ruth A. & Dan Slobin. 1994. Relating events in narrative. Hillsdale: Edbaum.
  • 9Blank, Andreas & Peter Koch, eds. 1999. Historical semantics and cognition. Berlin: De Gruyter.
  • 10Brisard, Frank, Steven Frisson & Dominiek Sandra. 2001. Processing unfamiliar metaphors in a self-paced reading task. Metaphor and Symbol 16: 87-108.

共引文献2212

同被引文献17

  • 1王寅.认知语义学[J].四川外语学院学报,2002,18(2):58-62. 被引量:82
  • 2吴静,石毓智.英汉形容词概念化的差别对其有无标记用法的影响[J].外语研究,2005,22(4):14-19. 被引量:11
  • 3石毓智,白解红.汉英形容词概念化的差别及其句法后果[J].四川外语学院学报,2006,22(6):77-82. 被引量:14
  • 4戴炜栋,陆国强.概念能力与概念表现[J].外国语,2007,30(3):10-16. 被引量:29
  • 5Crotl, W. & D. Alan Cruse. Cognitive Linguistics [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  • 6Langacker, R. W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (Vol I ): Theoretical Prerequisites [M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.
  • 7Langacker, R. W. Grammar and Conceptualization [M]. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999.
  • 8Langacker, R. W. Why mind is necessary [A]. In L. Albertazzi (ed.) Meaning and Cognition [C]. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2000.
  • 9Langacker, R W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (Vol I1): Descriptive Application [M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1991.
  • 10Langacker, R. W. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar (2nd ed) [M]. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Cmayter, 2002.

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部