摘要
不安抗辩权制度的设立,对维护交易秩序、保障交易安全起了积极作用。但我国《合同法》对此制度规定过于简略,缺乏可操作性,有必要加以完善。不安抗辩权制度与《合同法》规定的另一制度—预期违约制度存在着明显区别,它们是各自独立、相互补充的关系。
Establishing the system of the right of uneasy counterplea plays a positive role on defending trade order and ensuring trade safety. But Chinese Law about Contracts about this system is very simple and short of operatability. So it is necessary to perfect it. The system of the right of uneasycounterargument is clear different from the other system in Law about Contracts--break a contract expectantly. Their relations are independent andsupplementary.
出处
《商丘职业技术学院学报》
2002年第2期59-60,共2页
JOURNAL OF SHANGQIU POLYTECHNIC
关键词
不安抗辩
操作性
完善
预期违约
uneasy counterargument
operatability
perfect
break a contract expectantly