摘要
商事仲裁具有准司法性和契约性,商事仲裁员刑事责任只能由准司法性因素决定。许多国家实行仲裁员法律责任有限豁免绝不意味着刑事责任的豁免,少数国家立法明文规定仲裁员承担类似法官、公务员刑事责任。过分强调仲裁契约性是引发各种仲裁员刑事责任争议的一个重要原因,时间证明这一应对类似司法腐败的制度安排并未产生实质性负面影响。
Commercial arbitration is featured by quasi-judicatory and contract,while the criminal liability of commercial arbitrators could be only determined by quasi-judicatory factor.In many countries,limited immunity from arbitrators legal liability does not mean the immunity from criminal liability.There are not only a very small number of countries that have provided provisions that arbitrators should take the criminal rap just as judges or civil servants do.The overemphasis on contractual character of arbitrat...
出处
《上海财经大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第3期26-33,共8页
Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
基金
国家哲学社会科学基金项目"中国仲裁法制改革研究"(08BFX066)的阶段性成果之一
关键词
仲裁员
商事仲裁
刑事责任
豁免
枉法仲裁
arbitrator
commercial arbitration
criminal liability
immunity
law-bending arbitration