期刊文献+

论我国法院变更指控制度之构建

On Constructing the System of Modifying Accusation by Court in Our Country
下载PDF
导出
摘要 法院是拥有最终定罪权的唯一机关,其对于检察机关指控的变更也是应有之义,但径行的变更则触动了"不告不理"的基本诉讼理念。我国法院的变更指控立法和实践恰恰暴露了这一问题,要解决这一弊病可仿效大陆法系的程序性限制模式,设置我国的"间接变更罪名程序",并辅之以"公诉事实同一"的前提性原则,构建出符合我国司法环境的法院变更指控制度。 Court is the only organ enjoying the right of final conviction,so it can modify the accusation from procuratorial organs.However,the basic litigation concept "no trial without complaint" is changed by it.The legislation and practice of court modifying accusation in our country exposed this problem.To overcome this,we can imitate the procedural limit model in the continental law system,set up our country s procedure of indirect modification of accusation based on the principle of identity of public prosecuti...
作者 顾彬
出处 《湖南公安高等专科学校学报》 2010年第5期67-71,共5页 Journal of Huan Public Security College
关键词 法院变更指控 间接变更罪名程序 公诉事实同一 modify accusation by court procedure of indirect modification of charges identity of public prosecution facts
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献28

共引文献222

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部