期刊文献+

英语习语理解方式的类型综观

An Overview on the Types of the Approaches to Understanding English Idioms
原文传递
导出
摘要 目前,对英语习语理解方式的研究往往从单一视阈进行,如通过英汉文化差异的比较解读习语的意义。然而,参照利奇的"意义"七分法,对习语的意义进行分类,发现其意义的建构机制具有两个特征:理据的复杂性和表达手段的多相性。前者反映出理据是多源的,涉及民俗、文化、概念域知识等。后者体现出其认知的基础,关系到隐喻、转喻、象征和概念合成等认知模式。由此证实,英语习语的理解方式应是混合性的,包括民俗、文化和认知模式三种类型。 Currently,the researches into the approaches to understanding English idioms are mostly conducted from one angle,such as comparing the differences between English and Chinese cultures to access idiom meanings.However,classifying the meanings of idioms,by referring to Leech s seven ways of classifying meanings,discloses two features of the mechanism of their meaning construction:one is the complexity of motivations;and the other is the heterogeneity of means of expressing meanings.The former suggests that th...
作者 徐景亮
出处 《当代外语研究》 2010年第11期37-40,31+62,共6页 Contemporary Foreign Language Studies
基金 江苏省2009年度高校哲学社科基金项目(09SJD740010)研究的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献24

  • 1冯建文,刘晓晖.谈英汉基本颜色词的文化伴随意义[J].社科纵横,2003,18(3):81-83. 被引量:15
  • 2吴旭东,陈晓庆.中国英语学生课堂环境下词汇能力的发展[J].现代外语,2000,23(4):349-360. 被引量:292
  • 3Bulut, T, & I. Celik-Yazici. 2004. Idiom processsing in L2 : Through rose-colored glasses [J]. The Reoding Matrix 4/2: 105-116.
  • 4Charteris-Black, J. 2002.Sccond language figurative proficiency: A comparative study of Malay and English [J]. Applied Linguistics 23/1: 104-133.
  • 5Cooper, T. C. 1999. Processing of idioms by L2 learners of English [J]. TESOL Quarterly 33/2: 233-262.
  • 6Cronk, B.C. & W. A. Schweigert. 1992. The comprehension of idioms: The effects of familiarity, literalness, and usage [J]. Applied Psycholinguistics 13: 131-146.
  • 7Danesi, M. 1986. The role of metaphor in second language pedagogy [J ]. Rossegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata 18/3: 1-10.
  • 8Danesi, M. 2000. Semiotics in Language Education [M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 9Gibbs, R.W. & N. P. Nayak. 1989. Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behaviour of idioms [J]. Gognitive Psychology 21:100-138.
  • 10Gibbs, R.W., N. P. Nayak & C. Cutting. 1989. How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 28 : 576-593.

共引文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部