摘要
[目的]评价电针、红外线加揿针治疗颈椎病临床疗效。[方法]将颈椎病患者随机分为两组,治疗组用电针、红外线加揿针治疗,对照组用电针配合红外线照射治疗,治疗一疗程进行评定。[结果]治疗组45例,治愈8例,好转32例,未愈5例,总有效率88.89%;对照组45例,为治愈2例,好转28例,未愈15例,总有效率66.67%。两组治疗结果比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。[结论]电针、红外线加揿针治疗颈椎病疗效优于电针、红外线治疗。
[Objective] To evaluate the clinical effect of acusector infrared and pressed needle on spondylopathy.[Method] Randomly divide the patients into treatment group 1 with acusector infrared and pressed needle,and control group 2 with acusector and infrared.[Result] In treatment group,8 cases were cured,32 better,5 not cured,and total effective rate 88.89%; for group 2,they were 2,28,15 and 66.67% respectively.There’s marked difference between them.[Conclusion] Acusector infrared and pressed needle are better in treating spondylopathy.
出处
《浙江中医药大学学报》
CAS
2010年第4期581-581,584,共2页
Journal of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University
关键词
电针
揿针
埋针
运动疗法
颈椎病
acusector
pressed needle
bury needle
sport therapy
spondylopathy
