期刊文献+

Cetuximab plus FOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer: CECOG trial 被引量:17

Cetuximab plus FOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer: CECOG trial
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To investigate efficacy and safety of cetuximab combined with two chemotherapy regimens in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Randomized patients received cetuximab with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), folinic acid (FA) and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) 6 (arm A, n = 74) or 5-FU, FA and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) (arm B, n = 77). KRAS mutation status was determined retrospectively in a subset of tumors (n = 117). RESULTS: No significant difference was found between treatment arms A and B in the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 9 mo, 45% vs 34%; median PFS, 8.6 mo vs 8.3 mo [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.06]; overall response rate (ORR) 43% vs 45% [odds ratio (OR) = 0.93] and median overall survival (OS), 17.4 mo vs 18.9 mo (HR = 0.98). Patients with KRAS wild-type tumors demonstrated improved PFS (HR = 0.55, P = 0.0051), OS, (HR = 0.62, P = 0.0296) and ORR (53% vs 36%) and in arm A, improved PFS (HR = 0.49, P = 0.0196), OS (HR = 0.48, P = 0.0201) and ORR (56%vs 30%), compared with patients with KRAS mutated tumors. In arm B no significant differences were found in efficacy by KRAS mutation status. Treatment in arms A and B was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that combinations of cetuximab with FOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI are effective and significantly improve clinical outcome in KRAS wild-type compared with KRAS mutated mCRC. AIM: To investigate efficacy and safety of cetuximab combined with two chemotherapy regimens in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Randomized patients received cetuximab with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), folinic acid (FA) and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) 6 (arm A, n = 74) or 5-FU, FA and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) (arm B, n = 77). KRAS mutation status was determined retrospectively in a subset of tumors (n = 117). RESULTS: No significant difference was found between treatment arms A and B in the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 9 mo, 45% vs 34%; median PFS, 8.6 mo vs 8.3 mo [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.06]; overall response rate (ORR) 43% vs 45% [odds ratio (OR) = 0.93] and median overall survival (OS), 17.4 mo vs 18.9 mo (HR = 0.98). Patients with KRAS wild-type tumors demonstrated improved PFS (HR = 0.55, P = 0.0051), OS, (HR = 0.62, P = 0.0296) and ORR (53% vs 36%) and in arm A, improved PFS (HR = 0.49, P = 0.0196), OS (HR = 0.48, P = 0.0201) and ORR (56%vs 30%), compared with patients with KRAS mutated tumors. In arm B no significant differences were found in efficacy by KRAS mutation status. Treatment in arms A and B was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that combinations of cetuximab with FOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI are effective and significantly improve clinical outcome in KRAS wild-type compared with KRAS mutated mCRC.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2010年第25期3133-3143,共11页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 CETUXIMAB 5-fluorouracil folinic acid and oxaliplatin 5-fluorouracil folinic acid and irinotecan KRAS Metastatic colorectal cancer Cetuximab 5-fluorouracil folinic acid and oxaliplatin 5-fluorouracil folinic acid and irinotecan KRAS Metastatic colorectal cancer
  • 相关文献

同被引文献63

  • 1Ming Gao,Xiu-Ju Liang,Zi-Sen Zhang,Wang Ma,Zhi-Wei Chang,Ming-Zhi Zhang.Relationship between expression of EGFR in gastric cancer tissue and clinicopathological features[J].Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine,2013,6(4):260-264. 被引量:20
  • 2王继恒,李世荣.我国结直肠癌筛查和早期诊断十年回顾:1994~2005[J].胃肠病学,2006,11(4):245-250. 被引量:51
  • 3G Klautke,P Feyerherd,K Ludwig,et al.Intensified concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer[J].Br J Cancer.2005,92(7):1215-1220.
  • 4Wilke H,Buzaid A,Mathias C,et al.Cetuximab in combination with irinotecan in patients after irinotecan failure:an integrated analysis of four studies from different geographic regions[J].J Clin Oncol,2008,26(20):4062.
  • 5Ciuleanu TE,Kurteva G,Ocvirk J,et al.A randomized open-label phase Ⅱ study evaluating the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX6+cetuximab versus FOLFIRI+cetuximab as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)[J].J Clin Oncol,2008,26 (24):4032.
  • 6Cutsem EV,Nowacki M,Lang I,et al.Randomized phase Ⅲ study of irinotecan and 5-FU/FA with orwithout cetuximab in the first-line treat ment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC):the CRYSTAL trial[J].J Clin Oncol,2007,25(18):4000.
  • 7Venook A,Niedzwiecki D,Hollis D,et al.Phase Ⅲ study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) ± cetuximab for patients (pts) with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum (MCRC):CALGB 80203 preliminary results[J].J Clin Oncol,2006,24(18):3509.
  • 8Heinemann V,Fischer von Weikersthal L,Vehling KU,et al.Randomized trial comparing cetuximab plus XELIRI versus cetuximab plus XELOX as first line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC):a study of the german AIO CRC study group[J].J Clin Oncol,2008,26(Suppl):a 4033.
  • 9Siena S,Sartore-Bianchi A,Di Nicolantonio F,et al.Biomarkers predicting clinical outcome of epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer[J].J Natl Cancer Inst,2009,101(19):1308-1324.
  • 10Artale S,Sartore-Bianchi A,Veronese SM,et al.Mutations of KRAS and BRAF in primary and matched metastatic sites of colorectal cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2008,26(25):4217-4219.

引证文献17

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部