摘要
目的:比较乳腺癌保乳术后常规放疗(CR)、三维适形(3D-CRT)放疗、直接子野优化调强适形(DMPO-IMRT)放疗靶区剂量分布及危及器官受照体积等方面的差异。方法:随机选择10位乳腺癌患者,为每位患者设计上述三种照射技术的治疗计划。处方剂量为50 Gy/2 Gy/25次。所有计划都使95%靶区体积达到处方剂量要求。根据积分剂量体积直方图(DVH)比较靶区受量和相关正常器官受量的差异和剂量分布。结果:三种技术靶区均匀性指数(HI)和适形度指数(CI)差异均有显著性意义(P=0.049,P=0.001),其中尤以DMPO-IMRT的指标最佳。与CR相比,3DCRT降低了患侧肺、对侧乳腺和心脏在各个剂量区的受照体积,而DMPO-IMRT增大了患侧肺(V20、V30除外)、对侧乳腺和心脏的受照体积。与3DCRT相比,DMPO-IMRT增大了患侧肺(V30除外)、对侧乳腺和心脏的受照体积。结论:与CR相比,3D-CRT和DMPO-IMRT改善了靶区的均匀性和适形度。与此同时,3DCRT降低了本研究中各个剂量区危及器官的受照体积,DMPO-IMRT在降低患侧肺高剂量受照体积的同时,增大了患侧肺、对侧乳腺、心脏的低剂量受照体积。
Objective: To compare the dose distribution and volume histogram(DVH) of the planning target volume(PTV) and organs at risk(OAR) between conventional radiation therapy(CR),three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy(3D-CRT) and direct machine parameter optimization intensity-modulated radiation therapy(DMPO-IMRT) after breast-conserving surgery.Methods: For each of 10 randomly chosen patients,3 plans were designed for 3 irradiation techniques.The prescribed dose was 50 Gy/2 Gy/25 f,95% of the planning tar...
出处
《中国医学物理学杂志》
CSCD
2011年第2期2491-2494,2540,共5页
Chinese Journal of Medical Physics
关键词
乳腺癌
常规切线照射
三维适形放疗
直接子野优化调强适形放疗
breast cancer
conventional tangential irradiation
three-dimension conformal radiation therapy
direct machine parameter optimization intensity-modulated radiation therapy
