期刊文献+

从历史背景和修辞学视角探讨“名正言顺”观念中的“或然性”特质 被引量:2

Probability Informing the Confucian Principle of" Ming Zheng Yan Shun":A Historico-Rhetorical Perspective
原文传递
导出
摘要 "名正言顺"出自《论语·子路》中的"名不正,则言不顺;言不顺,则事不成…"。如果从历史背景出发加以再认识,则孔子所说的"名正言顺"具有"宣认‘名’正以使‘言’顺"的意义,因而是一种话语策略。由于"名正言顺"涉及"名义"、"道理"、"权威"和"说得通"等一系列内涵或意义,而这些内涵或意义又和西方古典修辞传统中"修辞资源的利用"、"修辞的基本特征"、"说服"、"认同"、"或然性"等一系列概念或意义不谋而合,因此语言研究者可以采用修辞学视角对"名正言顺"观念进行辨析,进而揭示"或然性"特质。 Ming Zheng Yan Shun' is a central Confucian tenet first articulated as a four-character phrase in the Analects. In its original historical context, the phrase carried the meaning o'f if names could be made to signify properly, then the speech would make sense and become persuasive [to the audience].' This signification clearly points to an intention for the tenet to be understood as a discursive strategy. And it calls attention to its association with concepts such as justification, logos, ethos and persuasiveness. Since these concepts further lead us to notions such as' rhetorical resources'', essence of rhetoric,'' identification' and indeed' persuasion,' we are justified to assume a rhetorical perspective in our efforts to reinterpret 'Ming Zheng Yan Shun.
作者 周念哲
出处 《外国语言文学》 2011年第1期21-26,72,共7页 Foreign Language and Literature Studies
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献12

  • 1武宏志,刘春杰.修辞式推论探析──从逻辑的观点看《修辞学》[J].青海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1994,16(3):87-92. 被引量:3
  • 2武宏志,丁煌.假冒的修辞式推论──亚里士多德《修辞学》的谬误论[J].延安大学学报(社会科学版),1994,16(3):19-23. 被引量:4
  • 3张春泉.白马非马:修辞式推论[J].修辞学习,2001(1):24-25. 被引量:2
  • 4亚理斯多德.修辞学[M].罗念生译.北京:三联书店,1991.
  • 5亚理斯多德.颜一等译.修辞术·亚历山大修辞学·论诗[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003.
  • 6Aristotle. Rhctotoric[M]. Trans. w. Rhys Roberts.New York :Random House, 195d.
  • 7Connors,Robert J. ,Lisa S. Ede,and Andrea A.Lunsford, eds. Essays on Classical Rhetoric and Modem Discourse[C] .Southcrn Illinois: Southern lllinois university, 1984.
  • 8Corbett, Edward, Classical Rhetoric for the Modem Student [ M ]. New York : Oxford university Press, 1971.
  • 9Hurley, Patrick J. A Concise Introduction to Logic [M] . Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company,1985.
  • 10Layman,C. Stephen. The Power,of Logic[M]. Boston:The McGraw- Hmill companies,2002.

共引文献11

同被引文献7

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部