大学生惩罚和奖励敏感性问卷(SPSRQ)的修订被引量：5

下载PDF

导出

摘要目的:修订惩罚和奖励敏感性问卷,并考查该问卷在我国大学生中的信度和效度。方法:本文通过翻译国外Torrubia等人的The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire(SPSRQ)的惩罚敏感性和奖励敏感性问卷,在中文背景下修订部分题目,形成中文版的问卷。对山东省三所高校的760名大学生进行施测。结果:探索性因素分析的结果表明,该问卷分为惩罚和奖励敏感性两个因子,与Torrubia的结果一致,说明SPSRQ具有良好的跨文化一致性。验证性因素分析结果表明,两因素模型数据拟合较好。量表的内部一致性信度分别为0.758和0.662,与行为抑制/激活系统量表和艾森克人格问卷的相关表明,问卷具有良好的效标效度。结论:修订后的大学生惩罚和奖励敏感性问卷具有较好的信效度,适用于对我国大学生强化敏感性的初步评估和研究。

作者郭永香宋广文赵平平马玉花

机构地区曲阜师范大学华南理工大学

出处《济南职业学院学报》 2011年第1期91-94,97,共5页 Journal of Jinan Vocational College

关键词惩罚敏感性奖励敏感性探索性因素分析大学生

分类号 G65 [文化科学—教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献10

1郭少聃,何金莲,张利燕.强化敏感性人格理论述评[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(2):390-395. 被引量：26
2李彦章,张燕,姜英,李航,米沙,易光杰,古洪勇,姜原.行为抑制/激活系统量表中文版的信效度分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2008,22(8):613-616. 被引量：70
3Smillie,L.D,Pickering,A.D,Jackson,C.J.The new reinforcement sensitivity theory:implications for personality measurement. Personality and Social Psychology Review . 2006
4Claudia Lardi,Jo l Billieux,Mathieu d’Acremont,et al.AFrench adaptation of a short version of the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensi-tivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ). Personality and Individual Differences . 2008
5Florin A.Sava,Ana-Maria Sperneac.Sensitivity to reward and sensitivity to punishment rating scales:A validation study on the Romanianpopulation. Personality and Individual Differences . 2006
6Chiang-shan Ray Li,Chen-Ying Huang,Wei-yu Lin et al.Gender differences in punishment and reward sensitivity in a sample of Tai-wanese college students. Personality and Individual Differences . 2007
7O’Connor,RM,Colder,CR,Jr,Hawk,LW.Confirmatory factor analysis of the Sensitivity to Punishment, Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences . 2004
8Torrubia,R.,ávila,C.,Moltó,J.,Caseras,X.The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray’s anxiety and impulsivity dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences . 2001
9Cogswell A,Alloy LB,van Dulmen MHM,et al.A psychometric evalu-ation of behavioral inhibition and approach self-report measures. Person-ality and Individual Differences . 2006
10Carver C S,White T L.Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality . 1994

二级参考文献40

1Bartussek, D., Diedrich, O., Naumann, E., & Collet, W. (1993). Introversion-extraversion and event related potential (ERP): A test of J. A. Gray's theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 565-574.
2Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994).Behavioural inhibition, behavioural activation and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319-333.
3Caseras, X,, Avila, C., & Torrubia, R. (2003).The measurement of individual differences in Behavioural Inhibition and Activation Systems: a comparison of personality scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 999-1013.
4Corr, P. J. (2001).Testing problems in J. A. Gray's personality theory: a commentary on Matthews and GiUiland (1999). Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 333-352.
5Corr, E J. (2004). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neuroscienee and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 317-332.
6DePascalis, V., Fiore, A. D., & Sparita, A. (1996) Personality, event-related potential (ERP) and heart rate (HR.): An investigation of Gray's theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 733-746.
7Depue, R. A., & Collins, E F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 491-569.
8Franken, H. A., Muris, P., & Georgieva, I. (2006). Gray's model of personality and addiction. Addictive Behaviors, 31,399-403.
9Fullana, M. A., Mataix-Cols, D., Caseras, X., Alonso, P., Menchon, J. M., Vallejo, J., & Torrubia, R. (2004). High sensitivity to punishment and low impulsivity in obsessive-compulsive patients with hoarding symptoms. Psychiatry Research, 129, 21-27.
10Gomez, R., & Gomez, A. (2005). Convergent, disedminant and concurrent validities of measures of the behavioural approach and behavioural inhibition systems: confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 87-102.