期刊文献+

Krashen与Bialystok二语习得理论比较研究 被引量:1

A comparative study of Krashen's theory and Bialystok's model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Krashen和Bialystok的模式是第二语言习得领域提出较早,至今仍有很大影响的理论。在概述其内容后,本文重点分析了两个理论模式的相似、相异之处。相似性分析使两理论得到相互阐释和互相证明,相异分析找出了互补之处,使其有了更强的阐释力,最后探讨了对我国外语教学的启示。 Models of both Krashen and Bialystok have significant influence on second language acquisition.Summarizing main idea,this paper focuses on their similarities and differences.Resemblance analysis testifies and elucidates each other.Discrepancy analysis leads to complementarity,making them more powerful in explanation.Eventually implication for foreign language teaching is discussed.
作者 石运章
出处 《山东农业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2004年第2期70-74,共5页 Journal of Shandong Agricultural University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 监控模式 二语习得模式 比较研究 Krashen,Bialystok,monitor model,second language acquisition theory,comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1[1][3]Krashen,S.The input hypothesis:Issues and implications.London:Longman.1985.
  • 2[2]Krashen,S.Language acquisition and language education.New York:Prentice-Hall International.1989.
  • 3[3]Krashen,S.Principles and practice in second language acquisition.Oxford:Pergamon.1982.
  • 4[4]Bialystok,E.Some evidence for the integrity and interaction of two knowledge sources In Andersen.1981.
  • 5[5]Bialystok,E.On the relationship between knowing and using linguistic forms.Applied Linguistics.1982,3:123-139.
  • 6[6]Bialystok,E.The compatibility of teaching and learning strategies.Applied Linguistics.1985,6:255~262.
  • 7[7]Bialystok,E.Communication strategies.Cambridge,MA:Basil Blackwell.1990.
  • 8马广惠.Bialystok的语言学习模式[J].外语教学理论与实践,1997(1):8-10. 被引量:91
  • 9[9]Ellis,R.Understanding Second Language acquisition.Oxford:Oxford University Press.1985.
  • 10[10]Bialystok,E.Achieving Proficiency in a second language:a processing description in Phillipson et al.(eds.).1991.

共引文献194

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部