期刊文献+

^(18)F-FDG PET/CT在肝转移癌及其原发灶和肝外转移灶诊断中的价值 被引量:3

The value of ^(18)F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of liver metastases and primary tumors and other metastases outside liver metastases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨18F-FDG PET/CT在肝转移癌及其原发灶和肝外转移灶诊断中的价值。方法对61例临床或病理确诊为肝转移癌的患者进行18F-FDG PET/CT检查,对肝转移病灶、原发肿瘤病灶及肝外转移病灶进行图像分析,并分别测量其SUVmax值。结果 61例肝转移癌患者中18F-FDG PET/CT显像肝转移灶为阳性者58例(阳性率为95.1%),SUVmax值为3.2~16.0(平均5.1);47例(77.1%)为肝内多发病灶,同机CT平扫中58例(95.1%)病灶表现为稍低或低密度。原发肿瘤中胃肠道恶性肿瘤占50.8%,肺癌占24.6%;但不同原发肿瘤的肝转移灶的SUVmax值并无统计学差异。80.3%肝转移患者同时伴有肝外转移,其中胃肠道肿瘤中29%患者仅有肝转移,而肺癌则全部同时伴有肝外转移。结论 18F-FDG PET/CT在诊断肝转移癌、寻找原发灶及肝外转移灶中具有重要价值;肝转移癌多来源于消化道肿瘤及肺癌,常为多发病灶,并多同时伴有其他转移。 Objective To study the value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of liver metastases and primary tumors and other metastases outside liver metastases.Methods 61 patients who were diagnosed as liver metastases and verified by clinic or pathology were underwent 18F-FDG PET / CT examination.Then the characteristics of liver metastases,primary tumor lesions and other metastases outside liver metastases on PET/ CT imagings were evaluated and SUVmax values were measured.Results The liver metastatic lesions of 58 patients were positive on PET/ CT imagings(positive rate was 95.1%).The value of SUVmax was 3.2 to 16.0 (average 5.1).47 patients (77.1%) had multifocal liver lesions,and the liver lesions of 58 patiens (95.1%) showed slightly low or low density in plain CT scan.Of all the patients,primary gastrointestinal cancer accounted for 50.8%,lung cancer for 24.6%;but the value of SUVmax of liver metastatic lesions were not statistically significant,although the primary tumors were different.Meanwhile,80.33% of patients had other metastases outside liver metastases at the same time,and 29% of patients with gastrointestinal cancer for primary tumor had only liver metastases,otherwise for lung cancer had all accompanied with other metastases outside liver metastases.Conclusions 18F-FDG PET / CT have important value in the diagnosis of liver metastases and to find the primary tumor and other metastases.The majority of liver metastases derive from gastrointestinal cancer and lung cancer,most of them have multifocal liver lesions and accompanied by other metastases outside liver metastases.
出处 《中华临床医师杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2011年第20期5904-5908,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition)
基金 安徽省科技计划项目(10021303025)
关键词 转移性肝肿瘤 体层摄影术 X线计算机 正电子发射断层显像术 氟脱氧葡萄糖F18 Liver neoplasms Tomography,X-ray computed Positron-emission tomography Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献67

  • 1文明,李少林.医学图像融合技术及其临床应用价值[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2005,13(3):223-225. 被引量:6
  • 2文明,李少林,罗天友,彭云,蒋明东,彭志平,陈刚.PET/CT融合图像诊断甲状腺癌——与CT、SPECT或PET的比较研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(10):1595-1598. 被引量:1
  • 3施一平,黄钢,万良荣,孙晓光,刘建军,陈虞梅.^(18)F-FDGPET/CT显像在正常人各器官的SUV与CT值分布[J].上海第二医科大学学报,2005,25(12):1250-1252. 被引量:7
  • 4Cohade C, Osman M, Leal J, et al. Direct comparison of ISF-FDG PET and PET/CT in patients with colorectal carcinoma[J]. J Nucl Med, 2003, 44(11): 1797-1803.
  • 5Mac Manus MP, Wong K, Hicks R J, et al. Early mortality after radical radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: comparison of PET-staged and conventionally staged cohorts treated at a large tertiary referral center [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2002, 52(2): 351-361.
  • 6Schiepers C, Penninckx F, De Vadder N, et al. Contribution of PET in the diagnosis of recurrent colorectal cancer: comparison with conventional imaging[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 1995, 21(5): 517-522.
  • 7Huebner RH, Park KC, Shepherd JE, et al. A meta-analysis of the literature for whole-body FDG PET detection of recurrent colorectal cancer[J]. J Nucl Med, 2000, 41(7): 1177-1189.
  • 8Francis DL, Visvikis D, Bomanji JB, et al. The impact of FDG PET/CT in colorectal cancer: an outcome study[J]. J Nucl Med, 2003, 44: 26P.
  • 9Berger I, Goerres GW, yon Schuhhess GK, et al. PET/CT:Diagnostic improvement in recurrent colorectal carcinoma compared to PET alone[J]. Radiology, 2002, 225 (Suppl P): 242.
  • 10Kinkel K, Lu Y, Both M, et al. Detection of hepatic metas- tases from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract by using noninvasive imaging methods (US, CT, MR imaging, PET): a meta-analysis[J]. Radiology, 2002, 224(3): 748-756.

共引文献41

同被引文献28

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部