摘要
关于衡量垄断的标准有三对:本身违法原则与合理分析原则、结构主义原则与行为主义原则、纯粹效果原则与利益平衡原则。在这三对相互对立而又相互依存的原则中,结构主义原则与行为主义原则最具可操作性。从结构主义与行为主义原则的产生、发展入手,分析了两者相同和不同的价值取向,提出了中国衡量垄断的标准是:以行为主义为主辅之以结构主义,即应鼓励发展规模经济,弱化对垄断状态的规制,强化对垄断行为的规制。
The three pairs of criterion known for evaluating monopoly are: the principles of self violation of law and of rational analysis; principles of behaviorism and of structuralism; principles of pure effect and of interest equilibrium. Amongst the three, the principles of behaviorism and structuralism are the most operational. By analyzing the origination and development of the principles of behaviorism and structuralism, this paper compares the similarities and differences of the two principles in terms of value orientation, and puts forward the criterion for evaluating monopoly in China, which is to take the behaviorism as the main, complimented by structuralism.
出处
《哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版)》
2004年第4期46-51,共6页
Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
垄断
行为主义
结构主义
价值取向
monopoly
behaviorism
structuralism
value orientation