摘要
关于区际冲突法上的公共秩序保留问题,理论上存在着三种截然不同的观点,同时,各复合法域国家在这方面的实践也不尽一致。在我国,目前存在四个不同的法域,在解决其间法律冲突的时候,是否适用"公共秩序保留"制度,以及如何维护本法域的公共秩序,便成了一个亟待解决的问题。在各法域类推适用国际私法规则以及各法域分别制定区际冲突法这两种解决区际法律冲突的途径中,应该采取"有限适用说"。
With regard to inter-regional conflict of laws on the reservation of public order problem,in theory,there are three different views,namely,the denial theory,the common theory,and the statute theory.At the same time,the practices of each combined jurisdictions countries in this regard are also inconsistent.In China,there is now four different jurisdictions,in the settlement of the conflict of laws during the time,the application of 'public order reservation' system,as well as how to maintain public order in this jurisdiction,has become an urgent solution.When analogy applies the rules of private international law in all jurisdictions,as well as the respective jurisdictions to develop inter-regional conflict law,with these two ways to resolve inter-regional conflict of laws,we should adopt a 'limited application theory'.
出处
《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》
2010年第3期126-128,共3页
Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
关键词
公共秩序保留
区际法律冲突
结果说
'public order reservation'
inter-regional conflict of laws
the resultant theory