期刊文献+

责任原则在我国刑法典中的体现——兼论刑法第14条第二款和第15条第二款的删除与修改 被引量:1

The Embodiment of Principle of Culpability in China's Criminal Code——On the amendment of the article 14 and the clause 2 of article 15 simultaneously
下载PDF
导出
摘要 关于刑法第14条第二款和第15条第二款的删除与保留问题,学者之间存在针锋相对的观点。这一争论的实质就是责任原则及其引申原理在刑法典中如何体现。作为刑法基本原则的责任原则本身应当采取消极、否定的表述方式,同时还应当引申出刑法"以处罚故意为原则,以处罚过失为例外"的原理。我国刑法较好地体现了"无责任则无刑罚"的精神并力图体现其引申原理,但其积极、肯定式的表述方式则存在结构性缺陷。未来修订刑法时,应当按照各国通例,调整其表述方式。 About the deleting or preserving of the article 14 and the clause 2 of article 15,scholars have completely different point views.The essence of this differences is how principle of culpability and its deduction be embodied in the Criminal Law Code.As one of the basically principles of criminal law,the principle of culpability should be expressed negatively.At the same time,it should deduce the tenet of 'criminal law punishes intending act principally and faulty act exceptionally'.Current criminal law code embodies the principle of 'nulla poena sine culpa' and intends to embody its deduction.But its positive expression has structural defect.So when the Criminal Law Code is to be amended,we should observe the general model and adjust its pattern of expression.
作者 邓定永
出处 《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》 2010年第3期140-143,共4页 Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
关键词 故意 过失 责任原则 Intent Fault Principle of culpability
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献2

  • 1(意)杜里奥·帕多瓦尼(TullioPadovani)著陈忠林译评意大利刑法学原理[M].
  • 2陈兴良等撰稿,赵秉志,吴振兴.刑法学通论[M]高等教育出版社,1993.

共引文献4

同被引文献4

  • 1程胜清.这两款,应从刑法总则中删除[N].检察日报,2008-01-07.
  • 2阮齐林.刑法总则这两款大有来头,删不得![N].检察日报,2008-02-25.
  • 3我国《刑法》第20条第3款.
  • 4张明楷.刑法学[M].3版.北京:法律出版社,2007.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部