期刊文献+

唐娜·哈拉维的情境化知识观解析 被引量:7

An Analysis of Donna Haraway's Situated Knowledge
下载PDF
导出
摘要 情境化的知识概念是女性主义认识论的中心概念,对此,女性主义认识论者已经在认识论传统内的三个方面发展了知识的情境的三种进路:女性主义经验论、女性主义立场论和后现代女性主义。唐娜·哈拉维作为后现代女性主义的代表对知识也进行了独特的解析。基于对一般情境化知识的理解,进一步对哈拉维的情境化知识作出剖析,可以发现哈拉维的情境化知识区别于一般情境化知识的特点以及与传统的科学知识观的异同。哈拉维的情境化知识分析对奠定女性主义科学批判和女性主义科学的基础具有重要作用。 Situated knowledge is a central concept in feminist epistemology and accordingly,feminist epistemologists have developed several approaches to the situation of knowledge in the broader traditional epistemology: feminist empiricism,feminist standpoint and feminist postmodernism.As a representative of postmodern feminism,Donna Haraway analyzed knowledge from a unique perspective.This paper,based on an discussion of general situated knowledge,attempts to analyze Haraway's situated knowledge with an aim to identifying the characteristics that distinguish Donna Haraway's situated knowledge from the general situated knowledge,and finding out the similarities and differences between Haraway's situated knowledge and the traditional views of scientific knowledge.It is noted that Haraway's research on situated knowledge plays an important role in laying the foundation for feminist critique of science and feminist science.
出处 《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期95-100,共6页 Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(09BZX003) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(3009-851014)
关键词 女性主义认识论 情境化知识 唐娜·哈拉维 科学的客观性 feminist epistemology situated knowledge Donna Haraway objectivity of science
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献53

  • 1Stephan Fuchs: "A Social Theory of Objectivity". in Ullica Segerstr? le. Beyond the Science Wars: The Missing Discourse about Science and Society ( ed. ) [ C ]. Albany : State University of New York Press, 2000. 156, 155 - 158, 156.
  • 2Lynch, M. Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. 317.
  • 3Peter Novick. That Nobel Dream: The "Objectivity Question" and the American Historical Profession [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. 1.
  • 4Donna Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs,and Women[M]. New York: Roudedge, 1991. 187, 188,191-192, 193, 193, 193, 193, 190, 193, 195, 193, 196,191, 191, 195, 196, 185, 190, 187.
  • 5桑德拉·哈丁.科学的文化多元性[M].南昌:江西教育出版社,2002.103,207,212,174.
  • 6赛德曼.后现代转向[C].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,2001.111.
  • 7乔治·迈尔逊.哈拉维与基因改良食品[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005,11..
  • 8Tanesini, Alessandra, An Introduction to Feminist Epistemologies, Oxford. Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 1999,17 - 18.
  • 9Tanesini, Alessandra, An Introduction to Feminist Epistemologies, Oxford. Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 1999,15.
  • 10Mangena, Oshadi. "Against Fragmentation. The Need for Holism", in Lennon, Kathleen. & Whitford, Margaret. (eds). Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Epistemology. London & New York: Routledge, 1994, 278.

共引文献11

同被引文献91

引证文献7

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部