期刊文献+

论我国刑事司法鉴定权配置的困境与突破

On the breakthrough in Chinese criminal judicial expertise system configuration
原文传递
导出
摘要 我国刑事司法鉴定权由公检法机关主导,当事人仅有申请补充鉴定和重新鉴定的权利。这种鉴定权配置方式导致刑事司法公正性不足、效率低下以及权威性缺失的困境。与我国刑事诉讼模式的转型格格不入。借鉴域外经验,我国刑事司法鉴定权配置应以公正高效权威为目标,赋予辩方司法鉴定启动权、保留侦控机关自行启动鉴定权、限制法官的鉴定启动权以及建立鉴定处分的司法审查制度,逐步形成与我国刑事诉讼模式相契合的刑事司法鉴定权配置方式。 Chinese criminal judicial expertise system is headed by the police,procuratorate and court of justice,and parties in action have only the rights of applying for supplementary judicial expertise or re-expertizing.This configuration has caused a plight of lacking judicial justice and inefficiency.By referring to foreign practices,we should have Chinese criminal judicial expertise system aimed at justice,efficiency and authoritativeness,empowering the defense to have the right of judicial expertise initiation,reserving the right of investigation and prosecution organs to self-initiate judicial expertise,curbing judges' right of expertise initiation and establishing judicial review system for expertise discipline,all of which are required to formulate a proper configuration of Chinese criminal judicial expertise system coupled to China's criminal litigation pattern.
作者 吴常青 王彪
出处 《政法学刊》 2012年第2期81-86,共6页 Journal of Political Science and Law
基金 天津市哲学社会科学研究规划项目(TJFX11-017)
关键词 鉴定权 鉴定处分 公正高效权威 诉讼模式 expertise right expertise discipline justice,efficiency and authoritativeness litigation pattern
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献48

共引文献235

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部