摘要
This paper makes comparisons between Chinese Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Guidelines for Air dispersion modelling and the advanced air dispersion model ADMS. Since 2001 the ADMS model has been the first and only foreign model that has been approved by the Appraisal Center for Environment and Engineering (ACEE) to be used in EIA projects in China (http://www.china-eia. com/inden_content/rjrz/ rjrz_ADMS/htm). In the paper the following sections provide brief descriptions of the main features of the Chinese Guidelines for Air Dispersion (Section 2) and ADMS (Section 3); Section 4 provides a comparison of the two modelling methods for some simple cases and conclusions and discussion are given in Section 5.
This paper makes comparisons between Chinese Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Guidelines for Air dispersion modelling and the advanced air dispersion model ADMS. Since 2001 the ADMS model has been the first and only foreign model that has been approved by the Appraisal Center for Environment and Engineering (ACEE) to be used in EIA projects in China (http://www.china-eia. com/inden_content/rjrz/ rjrz_ADMS/htm). In the paper the following sections provide brief descriptions of the main features of the Chinese Guidelines for Air Dispersion (Section 2) and ADMS (Section 3); Section 4 provides a comparison of the two modelling methods for some simple cases and conclusions and discussion are given in Section 5.
