废除执行通知前置程序问题探讨

Probe into the Issue of Abolishing Executing Pre-notice Procedure

在我国,执行一直是审判的附属,其效率价值的重要性一直被忽略,在错误的价值选择背景下,执行机关可以随意对执行依据所确定内容的合法性与合理性提出质疑,甚至变更或撤销。这样,不仅造成了审判和执行机关的功能错位,也明显地背离了执行法律关系的要求,致使债务人与债权人责任地位颠倒,并因此增加了债权实现的难度,严重影响了执行制度应有功能的发挥。针对以上缺陷,可以借鉴国外的失败教训和成功经验,结合我国实际确立执行开始确认程序,弥补我国执行开始程序设计的不足。

In China,execution has been attached to trials. The importance of its efficiency value has been ig-nored. Under the wrong value option background,executive organs can doubt the validity and rationality of the established content of executive evidence freely,even change or cancel. It will not only lead to function malposition between trial and executive organs,but also deviate from the requirement of executive legal relation. What's more,it will result in the reversing of responsibility and status between debtor and creditor,which will increase the difficulty in realizing the creditor's right and affect the function of executive system. To overcome the above mentioned defects,by combining to Chinese reality and refering to failure lessons and successful experiences abroad,we can es-tablish and execute beginning confirmation procedure to make up the deficiency of its design.