期刊文献+

中国反倾销法中实质性阻碍客体认定规则研究

Research on the Recognition Rules of the Material Retardation Object in China Antidumping Laws
下载PDF
导出
摘要 反倾销法中实质性阻碍损害标准运用的前提是实质性阻碍客体的有效认定。然而目前我国立法和实践中对此问题的研究都处于空白状态,这在一定程度上极大影响了反倾销当事人(主管机关和企业)对实质性阻碍损害标准的适用。针对我国实质性阻碍客体认定立法现状,借鉴世界各国经验,中国实质性阻碍客体认定规则应在未建成产业、总体未建成产业、改制公司和技术改造中新生产线问题等方面做出规定。 The premise of using the material retardation injury standard in antidumping laws is the effective recognition of material retardation of object.But at present,in our country legislation and practice,there is blank in the research on this question,which affected the anti-dumping party(competent authorities and enterprises) to apply to the material retardation damage standards in part greatly.According to China's present situation that the material retardation object legislation,from the experience of each country,our country the material retardation object should make rules in aspects on new production line problems of uncompleted industry,overall uncompleted industry,restructure company and technical transformation.
作者 付荣
出处 《河北经贸大学学报(综合版)》 2012年第2期58-63,共6页 Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business(Comprehensive Edition)
基金 华北电力大学2011年度中央高校基本科研业务费面上项目
关键词 反倾销法 实质性阻碍 客体认定 antidumping law the material retardation object maintain
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1李炼.反倾销:法律与实务[M]北京:中国发展出版社,199984.
  • 2付荣.美国ITC实质性阻碍案例之解析[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,31(4):50-56. 被引量:1
  • 3胡晓红.中国反倾销法理论与实践[M]北京:中国社会科学出版社,200190.
  • 4中国商务部产业损害调查局;南开大学WTO研究中心组.反倾销规则与实践[M]天津:南开大学出版社,2004170.

二级参考文献34

  • 1[1]Edwin J.Madaj.Agency Investigation:Adjudication or Rulemaking?-The ITC's Injury Determinations Under the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Laws[J].15 N.C.J.INT'L L.&COM.REG.441,469(1990).
  • 2[2]Michael S.Knoll,Legal and Economic Framework for the Analysis of Injury by the U.S.International Trade Commission,23 J.World Trade 95,99(1989).
  • 3[3]Morris E.Morkre & Harold E.Kruth,Determining Whether Dumped or Subsidized Imports Injury Domestic Industries:International Trade Commission Approach,CONTEMP.POL'Y ISSUES July 1989,at 78,85.
  • 4[4]James R.Cannon,Jr.Material Injury and the Business Cycle in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Cases[J].14 B.C.INT'L & COMP.L.REV.53,64(1991).
  • 5[5]Morris E.Morkre & Harold E.Kruth,Determining Whether Dumped or Subsidized Imports Injury Domestic Industries:International Trade Commission Approach,CONTEMP.POL'Y ISSUES July 1989,at 84-88.
  • 6[6][美]瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译,北京:商务印书馆,2003.
  • 7[2]USTC Pub.676,Inv.No.AA1921-140(May.1974)(终裁).
  • 8[3]ITC Pub.1234,Inv.No.751-TA-5(Mar.1982)(终裁).
  • 9[4]ITC Pub.1376,Inv.No.731-TA-127(May.1983)(初裁).
  • 10[5]9 Ct.Int'l Trade 154(1985),上诉被驳回,803 F.2d 1576 (Fed.Cir.1986).

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部